In the modern era, education is regarded as a crucial factor contributing to the thriving of people in various aspects of their lives. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the areas that we have to focus to increase the learning rate of the students. Many people adhere to the view that we have to concentrate on facts in our tutelage system, while others believe concepts will provide a profound understanding. Ego, when it comes to my stance, be weighing up the pros and cons, I firmly hold that the ideas should be emphasized. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that through the understanding of concepts, we can learn facts more effectively. Knowing the logic behind the facts facilitates the process of their comprehension. As a result, students do not keep forgetting them regularly. My own experience is a compelling example of this. During high school, I had trouble utilizing and adapting the physics formulas for different questions, and it was considered a hinder for me for getting convenient grades. One of my friends, named Ali, was an expert in this field. I desperately asked him to assist me, and he started by introducing and explaining the rudimentary concepts. Then, he taught me how to come up with complex formulas using the basic ones. Consequently, I deeply learned the process and did not have any problems with physics anymore.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that when we start using notions to explore different facts, our brain becomes more active so that we behave wisely not only in our school but also in the actual life. Having a more sophisticated mind, we are more likely to come up with novel ideas as solutions to daily predicaments. For instance, about ten years ago, we bought a brand new tv. We asked someone to adjust the channels so that we could have access to all the possible channels. One day, out of curiosity, I played with the control and messed up the settings. Although I knew I had broken it, I did not lose myself because we had a course in school about some simple ways of maintaining electronic devices. I tried to follow some basic steps at a time to learn the pattern of adjusting the preferences. As a result, not only did I learne how to fix it, but I also discovered new stations that we did not have access to. From that day on, whenever there is a problem with electronic devices, my family comes to me rather than paying some stranger to solve that.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that it is better to focus on concepts. This is because we learn more effectively, and they can be applied to solve the problems in our actual lives.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- TPO 02 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating childeren is more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking web site. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, then, while, as for, for instance, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2312.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72801635992 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77514681716 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541922290389 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.481247381 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.48 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.56 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152408787519 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400660276181 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374030421961 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851455986384 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452118297618 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.