Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Some people think that keeping old friends is more important than finding new ones. While, another group believe that building more and more new friends is better for them. In my opinion, to retain your relationship with your old friends as strong as possible is the best option for you. This is due to the difficult process of making new friends, the possibility of counting on old friends in hard situations.
First, it takes time for one to make a strong relationship with new friends. In the other word, you need to spend a lot of time with your new friends to find out their characteristics and decide whether he/she is a trustable person to continue a friendship with or not. While, this process has been passed when you are taking about old friends. For instance, when got accepted and went to the new university, my best friend in high school was also with me. In that time, I had tried a lot to make a new friendship with some people, but, the majority of my effort failed one after one and after a while, I notified that I did not have a lot in common with new friends. Therefore, I filled that keeping old friends is more important.
Second, you can count on your old friends in every circumstances. Your old friends are somehow like your family and your family never leave you alone. Put differently, you are always their first priority. For instance, when I joined my company, I made some new friends. After a while, I got a difficult illness and could not go to work for a while. As a consequence, I faced with some problems and company did not paid my salary for two month. Not only non of my new friends did not accept to do some of my postponed tasks, but also they did not borrow me money when I asked them. Consequently, as always, my old friends help me to go back to the life in that awful situation.
According to the above statements, I believe that retaining new friends is a better Idea than making new ones. This is because of you do not need to put your energy and time for finding new trustable person, In addition, you are always the first priority of your old friend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Machli | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | wuttichai.v | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n to continue a friendship with or not. While, this process has been passed when you ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'pay'
Suggestion: pay
... with some problems and company did not paid my salary for two month. Not only non o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
... company did not paid my salary for two month. Not only non of my new friends did not...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42894056848 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4985009093 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452196382429 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8531659495 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430513513314 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14989278849 0.076458572812 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797127505891 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314735682257 0.150856017488 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752339083907 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.