do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
more money a person has, he should give extra money away to charities.
Throughout the history, from the past era, many of people have been suffering from poverty vehemently. it is obvious that government's problems should not allow to get involved directly as well as effectively to allocate budget to ameliorate the quality of life between poor families. With this in mind, our society is going to take the huge distance between rich and poor family. In this circumstance, rich men should come to play and take responsibility for cover charity. I believe that, if the wealthy people accepted their roles, the society would move to lack of any poor. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into three conspicuous reasons to elaborate my standpoint.
First and foremost, wealthy people, since are role models of society, by allocating part of their incomes to charities, make the massive movement that majority of people could pursue them and all the people in society will have the appropriate life. Moreover, participating in humanitarian activities not only make high satisfaction in society but also lead to wealthy man acquire the best position in the society. Being helpful in community consolidate their relationship with both government and people. For instance, many of rich man under the shadow of helping charity find safety to perform both legal and illegal activities. At the first sight it seems that this perspective is extremely negative toward rich people, but if precisely has been evaluated, it would be clear that part of rich men has been performing these activities.
Another equally reason is that wealthy people by participating in charity activity reach the inner euphoria. As a matter of fact, almost the successful people who have the high position based on their asses, have grown in poor families and in the childhood tasted poor. In this regard, they contribute more than others people in the arrest of the poor. Besides, since, they have reached to all goals in their life, and have made past as well as now, it is logical to would make better future for themselves and their society.
The last but not the last reason is that if governments wanted to reach low poverty, they would attract well-known, celebrated, sportsman to stride big steps to become a prosperous community. Moreover, The GDP rate shows that countries are going to poorer. Therefore, wealthy people could play a decisive role in this critical condition because the governments are unable to solve this huge issue; otherwise, that is not unlikely that will have been occurred unexpected outcome to take away all the society the bottom of the valley. So, the wealthy man could play an effective role to shy away from this event.
To wrap it all, based on aforementioned reasons, people who have more money with performing humanitarian activity could make high satisfaction on, themselves, society and government dramatically. All in all, it has been anticipated that wealthy people in order to acquire high self-esteem, as well as high dignity, should play a colorful role in the society and not only themselves participate in charity, but also persuade other wealthy people to contribute this useful activity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-04 | shayan1372 | 3 | view |
- people should help charities by giving extra money of their wealth. 73
- hypothesis between passage and lecture about ability of an ancient animal that could be able fly or not. 75
- hypothesis about an ancient animal that could be able to fly or not 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 56
- do you agree or disagree with the statement? the ability to maintain friendship with small group of people is more important than ability to making new friends. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...been suffering from poverty vehemently. it is obvious that governments problems sh...
^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
...t governments problems should not allow to get involved directly as well as effectivel...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 768, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f precisely has been evaluated, it would be clear that part of rich men has been ...
^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de past as well as now, it is logical to would make better future for themselves ...
^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast reason is that if governments wanted to reach low poverty, they would attract...
^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... community. Moreover, The GDP rate shows that countries are going to poorer. Ther...
^^
Line 4, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot unlikely that will have been occurred unexpected outcome to take away all the ...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctivity could make high satisfaction on, themselves, society and government drama...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2631.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 514.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1186770428 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75876378193 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488326848249 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 836.1 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0820518222 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4761904762 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0558097626023 0.236089414692 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.019091748244 0.076458572812 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246116320854 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0349742248021 0.150856017488 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219005590792 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.