Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People holding different views cannot achieve success
as a team.
There is no doubt that nowadays, to have success, people should have their views. In this regard, some people believe that holding several views makes people more prosperous. Others, including me, contened the idea because people have limited views, can make decisions fast and have enough knowledge to express their opinions.
The first and foremost reason is that by having some specific views in some areas, people can make their decisions quickly, and it is essential to have a well-being life. They do not need to waste a lot of time and energy in decision making. On the other hand, people have a different opinion about something, they have trouble with their decision because to make something more productive, people should have unique ideas. Take my brother's experience as an example. My brother wanted to open a restaurant in another city. He tried to put all strengthen and weakness of starting a business in the city. It took much time to gain information about laws and regulations in the city and during the way he some times got disappointed. He had an economic partner who was optimistic about the business in another city. His partner had decided to run the restaurant, but my brother did not decide on the restaurant. At the end of the day, an unknown person started his restaurant at the place where my brother and his partner wanted to open their restaurant. The owner of the restaurant achieved much success. Had my brother not spent much time investigating different opinions, he would have started the restaurant and gained money and success.
The other equally reason is that people having different views do not have access to adequate knowledge to express their opinion. In this way, they almost always follow other people's views; however, people do not several views because they have appropriate wisdom to take some decisive views. Through this, other members of the group trust him because he can give his views very soon. As a result, the more knowledge one has, the more efficient he is in a group. As a case in point, One of my coworkers in our office was reliable because he did not have several viewpoints about projects. He knew what he wanted because he had improved his knowledge about the scope he worked. Everyone trusted him in tough situations and considered him as a reliable person in the company. One day, he told me that if he had not increased his information about the job, he would not have played a crucial role in the success of the group.
In conclusion, I think people holding some limited views are more successful in their lives and jobs as a team. This is because not only do not they waste time for their decisions, but they are a more reliable member among their colleagues due to their information and knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...due to their information and knowledge.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, well, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80584551148 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52915496567 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44885177453 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2217082749 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.08 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.16 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123603590321 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041816490564 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556484773375 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089818046489 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146511683109 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.