Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Undoubtedly, Teachers are one of the most important underlying contributors to cultural development of societies. Although, whether this view has been the prevailing attitude of people in the past as well as the present is called into question recently. In this context there are contrasting views. While some people hold the opinion that communities honored teachers more in the past than the present, others plainly contradict this claim and assert that nowadays teachers are more valued by societies. Personally speaking, I am more inclined to the latter and in what follows, I delve into reasons to substantiate my standpoint.

First thing to mention is that, teachers applied physical punishments to discipline students in the past, as a result, people did not develope intimate feelings toward them. Parents become angry when they observed that their innocsent children were bruised because of aggressive behavior of teachers. they held a grudge against them and usually did not act friendly when it happened to see them in city. A good example of this is the attitude of society toward tutors when my father went in school. Once he related to me that his teacher was of bad reputation in the town, because he constantly tormented children for not being attentive in classroom. as a result, my grandfather and other parents whose children were taught by the same teacher did not behave respectfully to him whenever they encountered him in the city.

Moreover, despite the past, communities are now more informed of advantages that being literate can bring to individuals as well as society, so they hold respect for instructors and appreciate their endeavors to educate the young generation more than in the past. Parents understand that teachers earnestly concentrate their attempts to nurture a learned young generation who are capable of finding a suitable career in the future and assisting their society by putting their knowledge in its service. Although, people were not much sharp minded in the past to grasp this, specially in less developed countries like one in which I live. They deemed school as an unholy western culture introduced to separate children from their families. Consequently, teachers who worked in such institutes were not welcomed in that conservative and traditional society.

To sum up, I strongly believe that teachers are now more appreciated by the community than in the past. This is because, they previously disciplined students using aggressive physical punishments and such behavior was not well received by the society, and because their critical role in raising a sage young generation benefiting both itself and the society are thoroughly understood by people.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...use of aggressive behavior of teachers. they held a grudge against them and usually ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...n for not being attentive in classroom. as a result, my grandfather and other pare...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, moreover, so, well, while, as a result, as well as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84188373355 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.010353576 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215474142012 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653233845093 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475619665096 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129170976988 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161615561772 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.