Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
While allocating more funding on advertising may be a wise move for the movie production company, the reasons on which it based are not enough to support this recommendation. Before some specific questions are answered, we could not take it for granted that more money spent on advertisements would benefit the overall success of the company. First of all, the author ought to tell us whether fewer people attended movies produced by other companies. To be more specific, although the report shows that there are less people attending the Super Screen movies last year than any other years, this not necessarily means that the general public does not like their movies. Instead, if the majority of other companies are facing the similar situation, we may consider a possible alternative: If the country is suffering from a major financial crisis, it would be reasonable for the public to choose not to go to movie theaters in order to save money. In this case, spending more money on advertising would likely to be failed in attracting more audience. Besides, although the author mentioned the increasing percentage of positive reviews about their films, it is necessary to acquire the total number of reviews. If there are few reviews available, such increasing would be meaningless. Let\'s imagine an extreme case, when there are only 20 reviews about a certain film, among which 15 of them show a positive attitude. Apparently, this is a frustrating situation for producers, which means that their film is far from being called a popular one. If the number of positive reviews inclines to 30 out of 40 the following day, that does not means an increase in the quality of that film. Therefore, we need to know how many reviewers respond to those films in order to judge whether he or she should recommend the company to allocate more funding on promoting things. Let\'s take a step back, and assume the reviews mentioned in the memo effectively indicate the quality of certain films. Even so, we still need to know how such movies, which enjoy many positive reviews, are selected. In other words, are these films an accurate representation of all movies produced by the company? The recommendation is based on the assumption that the Super Screen movies are of very good quality. However, if the answer is no, which means the author intentionally select some of their best sellers, the reviews would fail to estimate the overall quality of Super Screen films, thus the assumption would be proved unwarranted. Consequently, the recommendation that investing more money in advertisements is not convincing. In summary, although there might be benefits from giving more financial support on advertising, it is still inadequate to draw such conclusion from the reasons in the memo. In order to make the recommendation more convincing, the author had better tell us whether less people go to theaters, the sheer number of reviews about certain movies, as well as how the author select specific movies mentioned in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...lthough the report shows that there are less people attending the Super Screen movie...
^^^^
Line 1, column 628, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rs, this not necessarily means that the general public does not like their movies. Instead, if...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1638, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: mean
... of 40 the following day, that does not means an increase in the quality of that film...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 2870, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., the author had better tell us whether less people go to theaters, the sheer number...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, even so, in summary, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2520.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01992031873 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77503124307 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482071713147 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.111614021 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0777639444945 0.236089414692 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255813457266 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256339050983 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777639444945 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.