Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With no doubt, friends inrich our lives and make us live in a happier life. However, when it comes to the controversial question whether to maintain friendships with few people over a long time or to make as many friends as possible, people hold diffent opinions. Personaly, I think the ability to make many new friends easily is more important for an individual's long term happiness. I feel this way based on my own experience.
Firstly, a man who can eaisly make new friends is open-minded and willing to accept diverse view of points. Therefore, he will have more opportunities to learn from other's experiences and succeed. Take my friend Rax for example, he loves to travel around and makes new friends. When he went on a working holiday project in the U.S.. He had a chance to work with people from different coutries. During that project he learned how to negociate and collaborate with others. Thanks to the experience, he finds an internship in Google. Google is a big company and thinks the ability to work with team memebers is essential.
Second, a man with the ability to make new friends easily is prone to find resource efficiently. Since he knows people from different fields, he always can find some experts and ask for help. Again take Rax for example, when I was struggling to find a professor to write an recommandation letter for me to apply for graduated school, he has already got three letters from intelligent scholars.
Some people may argue that new friends are silver ,while old friends are gold. I disagree with this statement. It is not like to forget old friends when making new friends.
In conclusion, by the reasons that I just mention, there is no doubt that having the ability to make new friends easily is more important for happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...ew friends easily is more important for an individuals long term happiness. I feel this way ba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to travel around and makes new friends. When he went on a working holiday project in...
^^^^
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... on a working holiday project in the U.S.. He had a chance to work with people fro...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...struggling to find a professor to write an recommandation letter for me to apply f...
^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le may argue that new friends are silver ,while old friends are gold. I disagree w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76623376623 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67699481345 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1891552357 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2631578947 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336606839554 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108946128708 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862328699901 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211340737113 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807068312737 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.