Nowadays, there are many new techniques for people to communicate with others. However, what knid of communication is the best, various people hold different opinions. Some people think face-to-face communication is better than other methods such as email or phone calls, while others disagree. Personally, I believe that email and telephone call are superior than face-to-face communication because they are more convenient and allow people to avoid some embarrassing situations.
Firstly, email and telephone call are more convenient than face-to-face communication. Email and phone call allow businessmen to exchange information immediately. For example, if a businessman has to discuss with his boss about the lastest result of negociation with a client oversea, he doesn't have to fly back and talk to his boss face-to-face, which will take a day or more time. Instead, he can use an email to report the lastest result. What's more, the boss can directly negociate with the client via telephone calls. Therefore, email and telephone calls not only make the global business thrive rapidly but also save a lot time. There is no doubt that time is an essential factor of successful global business. In addition, email is also convenient for students to exchange the information about their project. Instead of scheduling a meeting in the library, students can discuss and exchange the information by email.
Second, email and telephone calls let people avoid embarrassing situations. Take Asia students for example, Asia students are often too shy to ask questions in class. They are afraid of being made a joke by their peers about asking foolish questions in class. However, thanks to email and telephone calls, students are able to ask questions without being overheard by their classmates. These new communication methods encourage students to ask questions which is of benefit to their academic learning. Also, it is helpful for a professor to control the time because the professor doesn't have to stop and answer students' questions.
To sum up, I firmly believe that email and telephone calls are better communication tools than face-to-face communication because they are more convenient and allow people to aviod embarrassing situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...t email and telephone call are superior than face-to-face communication because they...
^^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...f negociation with a client oversea, he doesnt have to fly back and talk to his boss f...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... an email to report the lastest result. Whats more, the boss can directly negociate w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... control the time because the professor doesnt have to stop and answer students questi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38920454545 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96774667691 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482954545455 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1094827155 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.85 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262442371658 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870173124409 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933593042284 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184952484016 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814323613366 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.