Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and example.
There is no doubt that friendship plays an important role in people's life, since people usually are influenced by friends rather than families. Some people claims that the ability to preserve friendships for a long time is very crucial for happiness than the capability of making easily new friends. I hold a positive view for a couple of reasons described in the following.
Firstly, people easily can rely on long-time friendship and give help from their friends in various situations such as financial or family problems. The statistics in Iran show that youth easily emotionally connect with their friends than family and consult with them instead of their families. Therefore, a ling-time friend can solve people's problem rather than a new friend. Since an old friend is completely familiar with the characteristic and the personality of his friend and positively direct her friend for an appropriate decision. For example, I clearly recall that I could not decide for major at the university and my best friend hopefully helped me to choose an appropriate major, because he deeply had knowledge about my interests.
Secondly, old friends are similar the family and people can emotionally connect with their friends. an old friends similar the family support her/his friend and in the dangerous situation efficiency manage her/his friends. The Statistic in Iran show that the young people are threatened by new friends to do some delinquencies such as drug abuse. In similar situation, an old friend like the family preserve her/his friend in hazardous situations.
Eventually, people have pleasure time with their old friends more than new friend. Since this friendship has been built based on their common interests and personality. Therefore, they can extremely enjoy doing such recreational activities. For example, I and my old friend spend a lot of time together and for long hours talk about our common interests such as our favorite movies or sports.
To conclude, for aforementioned reasons I strongly believe that a long-time friendship is of higher importance than easily creating friendship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO 50 Independent Writing Task all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 88
- TPO-50 - Integrated Writing Task: Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth 12
- TPO-37-2Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 70
- Tpo 32-2 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: An
...emotionally connect with their friends. an old friends similar the family support ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29464285714 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81969349653 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514880952381 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7010743457 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.647058824 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296282423809 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112981252696 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741725765389 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194680271049 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576050159185 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.