Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
As everything in life is like a coint that has two different slides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. After all, each and every topic and question requires careful deliberation in that there are multiple variables to a truth. Even though some may adamantly think students can do more efficient work when they work on assignment alone, I strongly believe this opinion lacks coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, students can learn more and do more sufficient work when they are working in groups due to the following reasons.
First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that at any level working with people in groups can engender a myriad of advantages. the main reasons behind this rationale is that individuals can share infromation and discuss with each other, so they can come to a better solution to any problem they could face. In addition to this, working with others will help people to develop good habits in order to improve their team-work skills. To illustrate more thoroughly, my friend Ahmad last year was working on his graduation project " Automated Power Supply" with three students from his department. Although there were four working on the project, there was no progress in the project. In other words, the other three people who are working with Ahmad didn't work on the project. so my friend changed his group member. As a result, he was able to finish his project on time. Also, they ended up getting second place prize despite all the problems they had to overcome. All in all, we can't and shouldn't overlook the upsides of having a good team work.
On top of this, working alone on project can result in unfavorable ramifications. In the eyes of many people in present day society, the individuals have to work together in order to get sufficient work. Needless to say, student who works alone they need more time than people who work together. Furthermore, everything in life requires from people to be as one hand as well as having good team work skills. Long story short, my cousing who works at program company called Upntu was assigend to do programs for a school alone. However, the company gave him two weeks to finish the program. As a result, he wasn't able to finish it alone, so he asked the company to hire more prgrammers in odrer to finish the tasks on time. Consequently, the program was finished on time and the school recommended others with his company work. Long story short, it's clear as day to me, not having team work skills can be detrimental.
In summation, yes, it's virtually impossible to provide a compeletly satisfying answer to an open ended question. Although the jury may be out in this give essay, we can come to a mutual agreement that when teachers assign project on which student must work on groups, they learn much more due to the following reasons and details mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1980s not to suppress natural forest fires. The "let it burn" policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summe 76
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 71
- Many consumers ignore commercial advertisement. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing”. The advertisers hire people-buzzers-who personally promote (buzz) product to people they know or meet. The key part i 78
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 80
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ps can engender a myriad of advantages. the main reasons behind this rationale is t...
^^^
Line 3, column 792, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...three people who are working with Ahmad didnt work on the project. so my friend chang...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...g with Ahmad didnt work on the project. so my friend changed his group member. As ...
^^
Line 3, column 1024, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ms they had to overcome. All in all, we cant and shouldnt overlook the upsides of ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1033, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ad to overcome. All in all, we cant and shouldnt overlook the upsides of having a good t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... to finish the program. As a result, he wasnt able to finish it alone, so he asked th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 918, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng team work skills can be detrimental. In summation, yes, its virtually impossi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, so, well, after all, in addition, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2429.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8099009901 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51840864821 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508910891089 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7151682661 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.16 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374812217299 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102073100157 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100052011512 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247172008238 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446163580825 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.