Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which people establish diverse kinds of relationships with each other within the society which in they live, it is not far-fetched to presume that communities, as in integral part of society, play the crucial role to that end. However, what is the extent of people's commitments in terms of contributing to these unions is considered as a contentious issue. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that individuals do not spare sufficient time to care their societies. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this statement will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, the cost of living is increasingly steeped. There is no denying the fact that so busy are people virtually with their jobs that no time left for doing their favorable deeds. In metropolises, people work at least ten hours a day to scrap a living. According to the latest research attributing to Dr. Kevin Rude, a prominent and highly respected professor in the Department of Economy at University of Macquarie, the number of people living under poverty line has increased drastically. His research revealed that the peak destitution rate was reached in Oct 2016 by 18% and it had surged by 8% in comparison the last year. This probe provides further legitimacy to this idea that a plethora of people has no other choice but merely spending their time and effort to make their living. Undoubtedly, in this circumstance, having found their families in jeopardy, citizens do not make a point of assisting the rest of the community's members.
Another crucial fact which should be taken into consideration is the public perspective regarding the government supports from vulnerable people. Needless to say that nowadays, particularly in developed countries, individuals are of the opinion that these communities have been instituted in order to facilitate the situation for whom require special treatment and care. For instance, diverse types of health services, both mental and physical, high social security, and retirement or unemployment insurance are the examples of supports that governors provided for their people who cannot live on their own. It comes as no surprise if the role of people in the communities become questionable and somehow meaningless. Subsequently, they opt to set new priorities for themselves when there are myriad other challenges that they should overcome.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that people do not spend adequate time to their societies. Not only are people tremendously busy with their earning a life, but they also have count on supports which may receive from their governors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | mucahit11 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | naziii | 76 | view |
- TPO 30 85
- TPO 20 86
- TPO42 83
- A/D: If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14573991031 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92036119711 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571748878924 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8314447289 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20434622986 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627147756642 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575796910237 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135468078995 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453680713418 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.