Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take too many jobs away from humans who are currently paid to do them.
Which view do you agree with and why?
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which the vast technology improvements becomes an integral part of modern societies, it is not far-fetched to presume that robots and computers paly a vital role in these progressed(). However, applying theseadvanced technologies to what extent is not make the human vulnerable is considered as a contentious issue. There is growing segment of people, who contend this idea that the mrits of substituding the robots instead of human workforce outweigh it negative ramifications(). I personally concure with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraoh, the rationale behind this statement will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, robots work in a far more efficient way. There is no denying the fact that making a mistake is an inevitable features of human. Indeed, regardless of the sever efforts and attentin, rarely do individuals managed to perform partciualr job without any error. Actually, one of the constant factor caused failure is fatigue. As a matter of fact, this feature give a sense of superiority() to the comouters. Therefore, having worked restless, robots enable fulfill the jobs with the highest level of accuracy which can be accounted as a crucial feature in the modern societies. In addition, salary is another notable element concerning human working. The more people work, the more wage() they require to earn. Undoubtedly, this obstacle is meaningless in working with comouter, and do not overlook the importance() of this factor regarding decreasing the price of the production to the end users. Subsequently, ventually, the huamn benefits from the usage of comouters in terms of obtaining the production with more precise and less price.
Another paramount point which should be taken into consideration is the issue of avalaibility the more jobs for the human. Needless to say that although computers take some jobs from the people, these robots should be created somewhere. In fact, individuals go for a job in other aspects which necessitate to gain more advance knowledge and experience. Thus, the human releases from the mundane, meaningless tasks and gets involved with occupations that needs to think. It comes as no surprise to say that robots have not this capability to do this type of duties. So, if the human had not been having engaged in these new roles, he would not be able to enhance its knwoledge.
To wrap it up, it is more judicous to say that having assigned the routin tasks to computers and robots, human take a lot of advantages. This issue occurs not only due to achieving the high-quality commodities with reasonable price but laso since creating new job opportunites which robots cannot overcome.
- TPO 27 integrated writing : Little Ice Age 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 21 81
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use 73
- 34 Integrated Why did the sea cows in Siberia become extinct 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who contend this idea that the mrits of substituding the robots instead of human...
^^
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'negatives'?
Suggestion: negatives
... instead of human workforce outweigh it negative ramifications. I personally concure wit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 552, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...e outweigh it negative ramifications. I personally concure with this idea, and in the ensuing para...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 714, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'earning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: earning
...people work, the more wage they require to earn. Undoubtedly, this obstacle is meaningl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14446952596 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89212272063 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559819413093 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6601938869 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.590909091 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1363636364 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25483386798 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654335822746 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438830899609 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14676298709 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047061460886 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.