Do you agree or disagree/ governments instead of individuals should cover internet fees?
It goes without saying that in today’s sophisticated world that we live in, the internet plays a key role. It is a treasure trove of information, which can help people in a wide range of issues. A controversial question, which is often raised regarding this subject is, whether governments should afford the cost of the internet or people should do it. It is a commonly held idea that it should be paid by governments. I personally agree with this point. In these lines below, I will present and explain two reasons to support this thesis.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the internet eases the learning process. People throughout the country, even in the farthest parts of the country or poor communities, can access to the latest learning materials by a single click on the internet. To be more specific, imagine a person in a far village that has no opportunity to possess a high level and updated education that is needed to do progress. It is crystal clear, for these types of people, the internet prepares a great chance of learning by using educational platforms such as YouTube. As a result, not only do these kinds of expenditure for governments do not require a huge budget, but it also helps them to have an educable society which has more benefits in the long run.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that the internet boost productivity in administrative works. By the internet, E-banking, or e-commerce can be used instead of the conventional method of banking or shopping. Without any shadow of a doubt, governments in the near past, spent a great deal of money to do excessive office services for their people's needs; to illustrate, they had to buy or rent offices for giving services or hired a great number of employees to do administrative activities. Nowadays, but people can use simple mobile apps for these jobs. Not only does use the internet for these activities cause more comfort and time-saving, but it also reduces costs and cuts red-tape.
In summary, taking all the aforementioned arguments into consideration, it can be concluded that if we consider the issue holistically, it is far better for governments to cover internet fees. It can prepare the opportunity of learning for all people, and also, level up productivity. Thus, let us hope that it would be more considered by society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-15 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | 47 | view |
| 2020-07-23 | mahdi farahmand | 81 | view |
- Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cau 97
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree governments instead of individuals should cover internet fees 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eople, and also, level up productivity. Thus. Let us hope that it would be more cons...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, thus, in summary, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87901234568 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94358478017 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56049382716 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.034329319 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190612045639 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053349980651 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491073195908 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112173017989 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320050821487 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.