Do you agree or disagree? to improve the quality of education, the universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
The question is whether to improve the quality of education, the universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors or not. With consideration to cons and pros from different viewpoints, my vantage point toward this idea is not positive. I ponder that there are other notable aspects for optimizing education in colleges. My arguments and reasons are listed below that will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that the professors play a crucial role in students' learning; however I am inclined to watch this issue from another dimension. As we all know, nowadays there are a lot of worthwhile resources which are available such as internet, smart phones and satellite and so on. It is may seems a bit of ambitiously, but whether we want or not, all of these resources can replace with the professors. The professor's knowledge is obtained through those same materials which we access them easily; hence spending more money for the professors is not a logic approach.
Two second reason why I refute this point of view, lies in the fact that the universities can cost on the libraries- with providing a large number of computers, renewing the tables and seats, buying the newest published books and etc- or the laboratories- with investing on the equipped tools- or the sport salons and even campus coffee-houses. To elucidate, take the students who use all of these facilitates. It is obvious that they will eager to attend in the universities more than before instead of sitting down in the ordinary classes and listening to the professors with mediocre knowledge.
Having discussed this issue from this point of view, I am going to empower it by the following the discussion. When the university rises up the professors' income, this salient question can create that they will try to broaden their knowledge base? It goes without saying that their information will remind in a steady level. It is an undeniable fact that when the professors do not feel any pressure on themselves, they are never forced to improve their performance.
By taking all above- mentioned arguments into the consideration, the following conclusion could be drawn about this issue. The universities need to other essential changes. The quality of education depends on other vital factors as ameliorating the students' spirit or the quality of the education tools, subsequently in existence of these points, it is no worth costing more money for the professors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- do you agree or disagree? it is easier to become educated today than it was in the past. 3
- Which one is better? parents have to ask the older children to take care of younger children or they must take care of them by themselves. 70
- tpo16 85
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate wi 40
Comments
Essay evaluation report
It is may seems a bit of ambitiously
It seems a bit of ambitiously
they will eager to attend
they are eager to attend
they will be eager to attend
this salient question can create that they will try to broaden their knowledge base?
Description: Check out books how to use 'that'
flaws:
No. of Words: 410 while No. of Different Words: 222
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 410 350
No. of Characters: 2029 1500
No. of Different Words: 222 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.5 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.949 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.78 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.193 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.278 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.479 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...es can replace with the professors. The professors knowledge is obtained through those sam...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n cost on the libraries- with providing a large number of computers, renewing the tables and seat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ssion. When the university rises up the professors income, this salient question can creat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223713646532 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.158836689038 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0782997762864 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0313199105145 0.046263068375 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0559284116331 0.0685040099705 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136465324385 0.118717715034 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0469798657718 0.0351676179071 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87505011207 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246085011186 0.0309702414327 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00447427293065 0.00188951952338 237% => OK
Determiners: 0.129753914989 0.0887237588012 146% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0223713646532 0.0209618222197 107% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0134228187919 0.0139019557991 97% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2491.0 2387.08602151 104% => OK
No of words: 410.0 408.028673835 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0756097561 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.353658536585 0.338922669872 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.278048780488 0.251872472559 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20487804878 0.174417080927 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.165853658537 0.112833075102 147% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87505011207 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546341463415 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 62.8335023932 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 24.1176470588 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0461617079 48.84282405 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.529411765 120.699889404 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.644075263715 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 51.9225251076 45.7405998639 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.65454545455 1.45489161554 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473104216391 0.300154397459 158% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0899761048877 0.103427244359 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0400823654741 0.0752933317313 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.536371183144 0.497263757937 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140691766818 0.151897553556 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186645230463 0.114077575197 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167092046983 0.0781384742642 214% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.353470900485 0.336927656856 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0320254732454 0.067059652881 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315829979004 0.210909579961 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819285929694 0.0618886996521 132% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.