Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
That the quality of work plays an absolutely crucial role in spread spectrum of one's success is an undeniable fact. Should people realize the impact of time that they take in doing affairs, they will ponder over it much more scrupulously. On the one hand there is a firm belief that people should spend less time and work quickly with taking risks; on the other hand, many people are convinced to do their responsibilities slowly and surely. This issue has recently been the topic of debate among most psychologists and sociologists. In the existence of all points of view, I do believe that the two paramount objectives of working slowly are studying about the subject and consulting. Concentration on the affairs could be noted as another rationale.
To begin with, it is axiomatic that studying is a key point in understanding details of the work. In other words, by taking time to learn the details of the mission, people could get more benefits from it. With this in mind, one salient example of spending time to find information sources for gathering beneficial information about the field of job is Internet-- there are lots of sources in the net and people could find them and make accurate conclusion.Therefore, nobody could overlook the fact that on numerous occasions spending time for learning and understanding related issues of work leads to prosperity.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that taking time in doing consultation has always been an inevitable part of success in doing responsibilities. That is to say, it is a well-established fact that experiences of most people could use as a light in our affairs. To elucidate, once I want to choose my major in the university, I spend most of my time to consult with second-year students of my candidate majors. As a result, now I am satisfied with my major. Thus, on no account can we underrate the efficacy of spending time to talk with other people with regards to its advantages.
Having discussed the issue from that point of view, I am going to empower it by the following discussion. There is a school of thought that concentration is an honorable value in doing jobs slowly. Doubtless, while we concentrate on a work, the conclusion is more satisfying. As a result, spending time to do a responsibility slowly cause concentration as well as more valid conclusion.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments into the consideration, the following conclusion could be drawn about the issue. Inasmuch as spending time have profound effects on being successful on that field, underestimating the importance of doing works slowly is not logical. Attending to this issue meticulously contributes to optimization in the outline of works, and revolutionizes miscellaneous aspects of industry and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or dis agree? because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability of plan and organize. 78
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 74
- Tpo44 80
- tpo15 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 'It is impossible to be completely honest with friends. 86
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 468 350
No. of Characters: 2289 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.651 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.891 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.024 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 150 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.402 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.476 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.291 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tely crucial role in spread spectrum of ones success is an undeniable fact. Should p...
^^^^
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...another rationale. To begin with, it is axiomatic that studying is a key point i...
^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... find them and make accurate conclusion.Therefore, nobody could overlook the fact that on...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'in other words', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand', 'that is to say']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260784313725 0.229887763892 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.152941176471 0.158761421928 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0725490196078 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.043137254902 0.046263068375 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0450980392157 0.0685040099705 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.160784313725 0.118717715034 135% => OK
Participles: 0.0529411764706 0.0351676179071 151% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.17915838549 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0294117647059 0.0309702414327 95% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.1 0.0887237588012 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0196078431373 0.0209618222197 94% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00196078431373 0.0139019557991 14% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2806.0 2387.08602151 118% => OK
No of words: 467.0 408.028673835 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00856531049 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.331905781585 0.338922669872 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.252676659529 0.251872472559 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186295503212 0.174417080927 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132762312634 0.112833075102 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17915838549 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503211991435 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 58.0283264426 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2380952381 20.5533526081 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4360313565 48.84282405 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.619047619 120.699889404 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 20.5533526081 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 47.505761191 45.7405998639 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.9674796748 1.45489161554 135% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317527776413 0.300154397459 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.09619039443 0.103427244359 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0643662426634 0.0752933317313 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.510400661229 0.497263757937 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122302291326 0.151897553556 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130737942864 0.114077575197 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668621773255 0.0781384742642 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.422445783598 0.336927656856 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0740154313304 0.067059652881 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233861287667 0.210909579961 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372400584311 0.0618886996521 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.