do you agree or disagree? one can learn about a person from the types of friends this person has.
The question is whether people would know a person based on his friends' characters or not. Everyone in consideration to his private perspective may maintain a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe the friends do not have any impacts on our personality while others claim humans' behavior or performance can affect each other during the friendships. Personally, I assume that mentioned questioned depends on some conditions and one may fail if he relies on one factor; hence, the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through salient reason:
To begin with, nobody could overlook the friends' role in life. Since nowadays the world has changed and people are involved in economic crises, social pressures and family problems and so on; therefore, the existence of a friend is required as a vital factor in the living beings' life. People need to talk, consult and spend pleasant times with each other to forget their troubles. When a friend relationship is made, both of sides want to experience the common interests otherwise the aforementioned association can be a waste of time. For instance, two men who have got familiar in the pool share a big passion toward swimming or at least they enjoy swimming. In another circumstance, the friends are inclined to imitate each other’s' behavior - this phenomenon is called social reaction in the psychology-. Should a person spend much time with his peers, so he is able to behave like them; hence, one can gain a total knowledge about this person with observing his friends' character and interest.
The second reason for my argument lies in the fact that sometimes the friendships form for other purposes such as achieving business goals or doing a project. In such diverse positions, people do not look for the same interest, but the point is important is that they tend to collaborate with each other to gain the success. Take my own experience in this field. Two years ago, I had to complete an archeology project with a clever girl who smokes a lot. Even though I hate cigarette; however, I needed that girl for finishing the mentioned project. One day, my professor invited me to his office and then he started talking about disadvantages of smoking. It goes without saying that he thought I was a smoky person due to having friendship with that girl. Finally, the professor apologized for his inappropriate judgment.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that a judgment about humans' characters requires more researches about their friendships and the goals which friends look for them.
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- do you agree or disagree?teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. 72
- tpo35 3
- tpo13 85
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child 5 10 years old 1 being helpful 2 being honest 3 being well organize 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'friends'' or 'friend's'?
Suggestion: friends'; friend's
...o begin with, nobody could overlook the friends role in life. Since nowadays the world ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...equired as a vital factor in the living beings life. People need to talk, consult and ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, therefore, while, at least, for instance, such as, talking about, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04906542056 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76676524496 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60046728972 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5772029232 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.736842105 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207733398299 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059390641829 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592827977832 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132441837485 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404803962235 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.