Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about a person from the books and movies that he likes.
Throughout mankind's history, cultural activities have been always considered beneficial. These must-known types of social activities, among whom literature and performing arts have the most crucial importance, are essential for every society’s promotion. The controversial negotiation which emanates from this phenomenon is whether a person could be judged based on his cultural entertainments, including his novels and movies he read and watch, respectively. Some people assert that they cannot learn about a person’s behavior in such a way, whereas others widely settle on many ideas about it without any consideration. I am of the opinion that anyone can show himself up by showing his taste in which the books and movies he is interested. For this purpose, I insist on two main reasons elaborating in the following statements.
First off, it is worth mentioning the idea that the personal interests which a person has provided a wide-range sort of data representing his extraneous behavior. In other words, what we act in the public is exactly a polished prototype of our intrinsic properties. The things that build a person up are as confined as it might be counted by a hand, two of which are mindset and emotion. In fact, the emotional acts as well as one’s mindset demonstrates all his disguise characteristics. For instance, I had an emotionless friend, which is certainly existed in everyone’s life, and catch him while he was watching a drama event. Nevertheless, whenever he had claimed that he has only dead emotions, I had not approved until I watched him at that moment by my own eyes in the way he was extremely crying. On the other hand, the books and movies a person decides to take are basically on their intrinsic interests; therefore, if I watch out them, I think I can easily judge him as well as his personality.
The second worthwhile reason I should notice here is that literature and performance art have often determined the progression of a person. As a matter of fact, looking from the inside out of communication reveals that gathering individual thoughts and behaviors of people creates the society’s level. If society could not perform well, we should find the issue inside the person’s life. To shed more light on this sophisticated relation, I explicate it as a small communication, family. Without any doubt, in a family, children represent their whole family degree. The more polite children, the more wealthy family. Thus, the cultural materials that a child consumes in a family depict his characteristics, and also, that of his parents. As a result, when we see a sick society, we should see its people’s life by considering the most cultural things that they use such as their books and movies in order to detect the source of sickness. This elaborates on the effect of cultural materials on learning about people.
To encapsulate the aforementioned idea, cannot be eliminated, the vital role of one’s cultural materials such as books and movies to learn about people. Obviously, there are thousands of linkage between a person’s cultural interests and his behavior, two of which could be noted as extraneous effects and one’s thoughts level. Hence, I endow people with what they just read and watch in their lifetime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...t mankinds history, cultural activities have been always considered beneficial. These must-known...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in fact, sort of, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2748.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09833024119 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00794472843 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534322820037 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 858.6 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9504084168 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.92 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.56 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.96 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201990189766 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506914079098 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529142137499 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132498007403 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330634758945 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.