Do you agree or disagree? People who always criticize others cannot be a member of a group.
Being critical is not always welcomed in groups and for most people it is a drudgery to face criticism. This might be because we tend to doubt the intentions of the detractor, we might assume that such a person intends to hurt our feelings by criticizing us, or maybe he/ she is trying to construct self-esteem for himself by destructing ours. But, in my opinion, groups should actually cherish such a member, of course if we do not take criticism the same thing as constant nagging.
Developing a critical point of view is not easy at all; usually, it is not something that comes naturally; in other words, it is a skill to be able to see the world in a different way. This kind of disposition might lead a person to not only be able to see the world in a new way, but also to judge people and situations more creatively. In a group, especially if the group is supposed to achieve a certain goal, creativity might come with criticism. But if we do not forget that in the group we are all trying to gain the same thing, then we might face the constant criticism with open arms, because it helps us all to scrutinize our matters from different angles that we might not have thought of. While/When I was a graduate student in architectural history, we were often asked to conduct research projects in small groups. A friend of mine at that time was actually such a person and her opinions in every step of each project were critical of what had been done. But in the end, our results were usually much more interesting and novel.
Another advantage of having such a teammate is having constant amusement! People who are always critical of other people, tend to gain a sense of humor to soften what they say and it is always pleasant to have a humorous person in the group. The important thing in this case too is that we do not doubt that specific person’s motives, since after all we are all in the same ship. When work gets hard and the tension rises up, that same person could be the savior of the group by cooling things down thanks to the pleasant sense of humor which is actually fueled with criticism. In friendship groups, this is especially pleasant and important. Once my friends and I went on a hiking trip and we got lost. Although it was literally our leader’s fault, our sometimes annoying friend who was always mocking us all, was the one who cheered us up the whole time. Make sure the example adequately addresses the topic.
So, to wrap up, I would say that if we trust such people, the ones that see the world in a completely different way and are always critical of everything that is wrong in our surroundings, we can actually learn a lot and also enjoy our time whilst working or even having fun.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-10 | Hoda95 | 83 | view |
| 2022-04-04 | hooria am | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-09 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2021-05-09 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | kamyar.sa | 70 | view |
- A company wants to use money to help employees work better One way is to improve the technology equipment computer printer used by employees and improve efficiency Another way is to redesign the space to make the working environment more comfortable 70
- The government wants to invest money to develop open space Do you think it is better to build a park to provide entertainment for everyone or to build a sports ground for a high school without a sports field 66
- Which one can make friendship stronger Having a good time with your friend Enjoy good time Solving your problem with him or her talk about problem Support each other 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People care more about public recognition than about money Even if no more money is given public recognition can still make people work harder 60
- Essay topics Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer TPO41 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... is a skill to be able to see the world in a different way This kind of disposition might lead a p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...on to not only be able to see the world in a new way but also to judge people and situations...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 895, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e example adequately addresses the topic So to wrap up I would say that if we tru...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, then, while, after all, kind of, of course, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36673346693 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41312523523 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454909819639 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 499.0 20.1344086022 2478% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2179.0 100.406767564 2170% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 499.0 20.6045352989 2422% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 107.0 5.45110844103 1963% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242404963779 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242404963779 0.076458572812 317% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161567694766 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595219125221 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 248.7 11.7677419355 2113% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -418.09 58.1214874552 -719% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 195.5 10.1575268817 1925% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.55 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 30.76 8.01818996416 384% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 10.002688172 530% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 201.6 10.0537634409 2005% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 10.247311828 303% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.