do you agree or disagree? should do students do miscellaneous things during the study as navigating on internet, listening to the music and reading book and so on, or it can hurt to their study?
The question is whether it is better to do? Everyone in consideration to his private view point, can maintain a specific direction toward this issue, however I strongly affirm that it is vital for students to take advantage from these types of entertainments. My arguments and reasons are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, students have to notice that are not forced to study to any price. It is axiomatic that the most important factor in learning is peace. If you are lack of any stress or anxiety, your brain will respond to your effort faster. The studies have recently shown that after the long study will be reduced the brain’s performance. For avoiding this circumstance, a perfect music or watching amusement clip can be helpful.
The second reason why I advocate this idea lies in the fact that continuous studying for a long time can be harmful for health. When students set in a position on a seat for several hours, it is plausible that some pains appear in neck, head, and back and even in their arm; consequently doing some sporty motions or dancing with music between studying can cause relaxation and also emit them from that condition.
Having discussed this issue from this point of view, I am going to empower it by following discussion. If students be a little diligent, they will be able to explore these pauses in the most correct ways. For instance extra information about the lessons can be obtained in rest time by students with searching in internet or reading a book or watching a linked video. All things depend on students how to use this time.
By taking all above mentioned arguments, this conclusion could be drawn that students with giving such pauses to themselves will improve their function and even prevent from lethargy and numb feeling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-21 | peerless alex | 73 | view |
- tpo11 88
- some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information; others think access to so much information creates problem. which view do you agree with? 70
- tpo22 81
- Tpo31 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 81
Comments
Essay evaluation report
students have to notice that are not forced to study
students have to notice that they are not forced to study
after the long study will be reduced the brain’s performance.
the long hours study will reduce the brain’s performance.
the brain’s performance will be reduced after the long study.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2 //don't forget subject of a sentence
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1468 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.705 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.498 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 100 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.616 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.467 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.372 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, second, so, then, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59589267442 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.453643502 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188382767523 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639988204453 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491758844119 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964456733936 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422353842217 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.