Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors.
Education is one of the most striking topic in modern society. Some people claim that universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. From my perspective, university is a place where the professors impart knowledge to students to expand their horizon. At the same time, the university is a place where should offer students more professional academic environment to do a research or investigate. So, in my opinion, spending money in buying facilities or in hiring famous professors should allocate equally.
A university will be more attractive by hiring a well-known professor. For example, in my college there is a professor who can make the boring subject vividly and the hard work easy to understand. Students love to attend his courses and always put heart and soul into the ocean of knowledge. So he is the most popular teacher in our college, even a person who don’t study in my college wants to go to the class of the professor. You can see that how charming the professor is, it makes university more attractive.
However, it’s also important that universities should buy advanced equipment to offer students and professors a comfortable and professional academic environment. For instance, in my college, the biology laboratory introduce an equipment which can analysis a sample of blood to provide the popular professor to do a research of human disease. Without this facility the professor cannot continue the research which he is addicted to. Indeed he might job-hopping to another university where supply the advanced equipment to finish his study, which may lead to a great loss of the university.
In summary, a good professor and the sufficient facilities of a university cannot be separated. I do hold that universities should spend money in buying facilities or hiring famous professors equally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... to provide the popular professor to do a research of human disease. Without this facility...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...e the research which he is addicted to. Indeed he might job-hopping to another univers...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in summary, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02091045879 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523333333333 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0869474831 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321330470111 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128986909403 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165816246334 0.0737576698707 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231877617577 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148933666619 0.0645574589148 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.