Do you agree or disagree? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
In the modern era, cloth has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, people have always sought ways to enhance their style. Some people may hold the viewpoint that outfit of humans shows their personality and characters. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believes that dress style cannot represent human characters. I content that dresses cannot represent of human personality. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mention is that people usually wear and choose a cloth available in the markets and brands. To elaborate on my point, when people want to purchase clothes, they would go to clothing shops and purchase<span class="hiddenSpellError" pre="and "></span> their dresses. In this situation, they must choose their clothes among dresses which present in shops. So, they do not get many choices to wear a dress. Furthermore, if people want to order an especial dress, they must pay a lot of money to the company, and most people do not have this. As a result, people do not have a choice about a dress, so we can not judge them base on which they wear. However, some work has especial forms such as doctors, nurses and engineering. In this situation, we can only have information about their jobs, not their characters or personality.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that people wear a dress base on which place they live. To shed more light on this matter, in each country, people must obey some role in clothes they want to wear. For example, people in America have a lot of freedom about dresses, and they can wear each style they want. But, in some countries like Iran people, especially women, must wear hijab. Most women do not like to wear hijab, but they have to wear it because it is low and they must obey it. Moreover, most people wear a different style in a different place. For example, human wear a formal dress in their work or a high rank of a party, but they wear a cajole dress when they want to go to a gym or picnic. So, we can not judge people base on an outfit.
All in all, considering the aforementioned reason leads us to the conclusion that human cannot judge each other base on cloth that they wear. I believe that people do not have many options for their cloth and they must wear dresses available in markets. And, most people must follow some rule about their outfit base on a country they live in. Indeed, we cannot distinguish people from characters or personalities.
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sch 73
- TPO 28 90
- TPO 41 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing sports can teach people lessons about life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- ۱- Which one do you prefer? Why?– a company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or – another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 665, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...r a high rank of a party, but they wear a cajole dress when they want to go to a gym or ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86830357143 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89665411642 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448660714286 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0860529342 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8846153846 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131494835197 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501822189449 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409129716115 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965694035514 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161013106756 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.