do you agree or disagree?Television advertising directed toward young children should not be allowed.
Advertising is ubiquitous in our daily life and has subliminally affected many people's shopping preferences. Even though it attracts remarkable misgivings, it does facilitate our daily life effectively concerning the time we save on choosing the proper commodity out of manifold products.It tends to be a general belief that companies capitalize heavily on the advertisement tend to be more capable of producing high-quality goods for solid financial background. Disturbingly it is not true of advertisement focused on the young children. The differences of mental and physicals conditions between the young and the adults may stand as a cogent factor to reject these advertisements in terms of the irreversible consequences they may spell on the vulnerable children.
First and foremost, it's disreputable that children are too naive to discern things they really need, in this sense they may be driven by these seemingly eye-catching advertisements, begged their parents and clamor to buy things unnecessary at all. The financial burdens foisted on the parents accordingly will definitely intensify the tensions of the family, especially for these young and newly-wed couples. Besides this, these advertisements may urge children to eat junk food and since these food could be exceedingly debilitating, they may even make damages on children's bodies at their most flourishing age. this kind of accidents just happened to my nephew, who is only 4 years old, however, under the temptations of advertisements for fried-chicken, he has gained surprising weights in several months and eventually proved to be unhealthy to some extent because of over intake of fat.
Furthermore, these advertisements can serve as a tool to entice children to buy exorbitant clothes or shoes to boast with their friends. children are susceptible and credulous for they are too young to gain the ability of self-discipline and are easily entrapped themselves with the vicious spiral of pursuing brands blindly. The rapidly increasing figure of luxury clothes dressed on children exemplify the fact they are outright devoid of self-control ability and may subject readily to the lures. this trend may even escalate if parents have no means to refuse their children's persistent requests.
To illustrate, advertisements do enable us to buy favorable goods without the hassle of comparing everything tediously before purchasing, but their positive influences are mainly on mature and clear-minded groups. When it comes to advertising directly towards children, we can not assure that these advertisements would not hamper the natural and healthy growing process of children and lead them astray.
In a nutshell, blemishes encompassed within advertisements towards children reinforce the idea that it is detrimental for the family and may cause severe results if we permit their circulations. Based on these statements mentioned before, I want to reiterate my standpoint that by no means should advertisements directly towards children be allowed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Nurmira | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | shrjhn1234 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | siri25 | 66 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | Eveluvkwin | 76 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | Eveluvkwin | 76 | view |
- Traveling alone or in groups 90
- do you agree or disagree?Television advertising directed toward young children should not be allowed. 76
- traveling alone or in groups 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement/Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Please help me correct this essay! Thank you 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...oper commodity out of manifold products.It tends to be a general belief that compa...
^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...rge children to eat junk food and since these food could be exceedingly debilitating, they...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 614, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s bodies at their most flourishing age. this kind of accidents just happened to my n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
...s or shoes to boast with their friends. children are susceptible and credulous for they ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...y and may subject readily to the lures. this trend may even escalate if parents have...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21695124657 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5805075447 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.125 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269262387008 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961873537393 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741331814988 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164606256315 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632039769976 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 11.7677419355 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.