Do you agree with the statement that the opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important for the young people than they are to the older people?
People always want to listen others’ opinion about some aspects of life. Among advisers, famous celebrities have a lot of influence on each person. I believe that youngsters get easily influenced by the celebrities compared to elder persons. I will elaborate my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, young generation have enthusiasm of doing things differently. Celebrities get attention of thousands of people because they achieved a lot in their life. Young generation inspired by their fame and name, and they also want to be like them. Every young person has his/her own favorite idols. They also follow the path of their favorite idols. Any statements given by their favorite idols has a very strong impact on young generation’s mind. However, it is not necessary that all youngsters have the influence of celebrities. But they admire them when they are with their friends. For example, I was not a big fan of the TV drama. But, I used to admire celebrities from the drama to my friends, so they do not think that I am outdated.
Secondly, older people are mature enough to understand the difference between right and wrong, and thus elders do not get influenced by celebrities. Moreover, social media is the best way for stars to express their feelings and thus easily reach out to young people. In addition, young generation spends more time on the social media compare to the older generation. Youngsters watch celebrities’ videos and share with their friends and others. So, more and more people get involved in the influence of celebrities. Nevertheless, it is risky for the youngsters to just blindly follow celebrities. For example, in movies, celebrities perform dangerous stunts very easily. Sometime, youngsters try to perform such stunts by their own without careful thinking and they end up putting their life at risk.
Let’s put in a nutshell, due to lack of maturity and life experience by youngsters make them an easy target to be influenced by the celebrities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | Ghooghooli | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Casimo | 63 | view |
| 2018-09-05 | ankitapatel | 65 | view |
| 2016-08-08 | sahar.r | 73 | view |
| 2014-06-06 | UrbanLynx | 70 | view |
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts about whether some painters attributed to Rembrandt were actually. painted by him. One such painting is known as Portrait of Elderly Women in a White Bonner. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Practice and hard work are more important to an athlete s success than natural ability and talent Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that television advertisements affect young children s behavior Please include reasons and examples in your answer 76
- In your opinion, which of the following strategies is the best way for a student to prepare for a successful career?Studying specific academic subjectsTaking a part-time jobGetting to know other studentsUse specific reasons and examples to support your an 60
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...t some aspects of life. Among advisers, famous celebrities have a lot of influence on each person....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey end up putting their life at risk. Let's put in a nutshell, due to lac...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13373860182 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93457765466 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3538270522 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.4347826087 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3043478261 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248015245855 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691981164564 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493263167528 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128363926126 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816751720781 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.