Dynamic changes in the world make our lives less comfortable
It is generally agreed that changes in our world occur with increasing frequency. Personally, I am prone to believe that these changes make our lives better and, therefore, we are more satisfied with our lives than we were in the past. I hold this opinion since the permanent transformation of the world contributes to the development of medical science; the life becomes more and more comfortable; and the world becomes a safer place to live.
To begin with, the advances in medicine are obvious nowadays. Some of the diseases that were incurable in the recent past can be effectively fought today thanks to the development of science. As a result, people live healthier and longer. For instance, several years ago medicine was powerless in cancer treatment whereas at present there is some medication that helps extend patients' lives. So, dynamic changes in the medical science contribute to healthier life of people.
Additionally, new technologies make or life more comfortable. This is explained by the fact that technological companies all over the world produce more and more products that can do things instead of us or facilitate our lives and work. The invention and ongoing development of the Internet is an excellent example of this. Nowadays we do not need to go to libraries and try to find information we need; all the largest libraries and their databases are incorporated into the World Wide Web and anyone may access that information. Thus, technological innovations ease our lives significantly.
Finally, the international community protects the well-being of the world's population in a more consistent manner. The lessons of the World Wars, committed crimes against humanity led to strengthening of the international cooperation in the sphere of the protection of human rights. For instance, more and more international human rights agreements are being adopted nowadays. Furthermore, new supranational bodies are established to guarantee that states respect their corresponding obligations. All of these are proves that we are more protected by the international community now than we were some decades ago.
To sum up briefly, the permanent changes in our lives have positive impact. They create necessary preconditions for our healthier, more comfortable and safer life.
- At present young people devote less time to helping their communities. 70
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 76
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ances in medicine are obvious nowadays. Some of the diseases that were incurable in the rec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...hier life of people. Additionally, new technologies make or life more comfortable. This is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ommunity protects the well-being of the worlds population in a more consistent manner....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35635359116 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12001257943 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560773480663 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6953614097 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.95 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282222505153 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814851636634 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801469941939 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162013894243 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101000539725 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.