Everyone wants to live a good life and to enjoy it to the max and in order to do so some people keep on wandering to sundry places looking for better opportunities and facilities. But is this kind of approach towards living is positive for oneself and the society at large? Well, many might disagree with this notion however, I firmly advocate this view point and will justify it by providing evidences further in this essay.
To embark upon, living at one place forever is very wearisome. Conversely, there are a slew of incredible realms to see and it would be a boon to get a chance to enjoy the beauty of these places. Moreover, it is vital for good health too because it involves a lot of excitement and activeness which not only makes you merry but indeed rejuvenates too. For example, few weeks ago, my mother fell sick and became depressed. In spite, of best treatment given, she did not improve. Eventually, a doctor advised her to go to some hill station. Surprisingly, after going to Shimla due to the pleasant weather, she recovered swiftly.
Additionally, it acts like a benediction for the growth of an individual's career. Mostly, working at the same place for longer period of time ceases your upliftment as people will start taking you for granted. In contrast, a new job offer, mostly comes with better package and perks. Furthermore, you are also more enthusiastic to show your acquirement and to prove yourself. I can reminisce, when I begin working in a new hospital recently, I was very much excited to work and it benefited me to a great extent as my boss promoted me last week.
To recapitulate, I would like to endorse my view point assertively that the advantages of going to a new place far outweigh any negative repercussions because change is the biggest truth of nature in fact, even water gets ruined staying at one place for a long time. Therefore, it is essential for a human being to enjoy life by moving around and appreciate the beauty of nature worldwide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
...oneself and the society at large? Well, many might disagree with this notion however, I f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll, many might disagree with this notion however, I firmly advocate this view poi...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'slews'?
Suggestion: slews
...very wearisome. Conversely, there are a slew of incredible realms to see and it woul...
^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...ll sick and became depressed. In spite, of best treatment given, she did not improve. E...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y, working at the same place for longer period of time ceases your upliftment as people will s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in contrast, in fact, kind of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70655270655 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72583921576 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621082621083 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9928868825 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1764705882 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213731815702 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555961202758 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571898719869 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119252765112 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271503441218 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.