The author talks about the ill effects of buzzing, he tells the various ways how buzzing can harm the society and provide wrong information to the consumers. However, the speaker in the follow up material cast doubt about the claims in the article by following reasons and justifications.
First, the passage tells that the buzzers hide the truth from the customers that they are buzzers and misguide a person. On the contrary, the speaker states that in reality the buzzers do not hide the identity and tell the correct information as they use the product first and when they are satisfied by the product then only they agree to advertise it for example the lecturer has been using his phone for a long time and is quite happy with its services. Therefore, he decided to be the buzzer of that company.
Second, the reading suggests that the consumers generally trust these buzzers and so they overlook various significant points that they would not do otherwise. This practice sometimes cause harm to these customers as they buy a bad product. To oppose this point, the professor explains that indeed the customer asks more questions from the buzzer about the authenticity, services, price and for how long he has been using the product. Thus, the consumer gets more reliable information.
Third, the professor contradicts the point made in the passage that the buzzing destroys the trust and relationship of people. He reveals that it is not true as a person agrees to become a buzzer only once she/he gets convinced about the product and thus passes on the correct information to the consumer. He again gives example of his phone company that he is very satisfied with the services of the company and hence he shares his experiences with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the consumers. However, the speaker in the follow up material cast doubt about the claims...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... he shares his experiences with others.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'thus', 'for example', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255451713396 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.146417445483 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0529595015576 0.0723426182421 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0654205607477 0.0435111971325 150% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0623052959502 0.0277247811725 225% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115264797508 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0249221183801 0.0370669169778 67% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53438139396 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0218068535826 0.0208969081088 104% => OK
Particles: 0.00311526479751 0.00154638098197 201% => OK
Determiners: 0.155763239875 0.128158765124 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00623052959502 0.0158828679856 39% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00934579439252 0.0114777025283 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1762.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 298.0 271.125827815 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91275167785 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.338926174497 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275167785235 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.161073825503 0.187439937562 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10067114094 0.113142543107 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53438139396 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520134228188 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 52.4504155982 53.8517498576 97% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8333333333 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2205341683 49.3711431718 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.833333333 132.220823453 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 0.878197800319 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 52.3501118568 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.44318181818 1.90840788429 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533499740913 0.549887131256 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14978484485 0.142949733639 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0795313572395 0.0787303798458 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.650909619587 0.631733273073 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183477494915 0.139662658121 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.274104545804 0.266732575781 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956632907702 0.103435571967 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.544199290503 0.414875509568 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0494626944059 0.0530846634433 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.410559348542 0.40443939384 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055813774256 0.0528353158467 106% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.