Experts suggest no more that two hours of screen time per day for children under 13. Do you think this is a good idea?
Some people agree with the experts in saying that children under the age of 13 should not spend more that two hours on electronic devices, while others disagree with the experts. Personally, I agree with the expert. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, adults should care about children’s health, and letting them spend more than 2 hours on screen might severely damage their health. Take my friend Todd as an example. Todd liked to use computer to play video games when he was young. As a result, he was nearsighted at the age of 8. Moreover, his terrible sitting posture injured his spine to a great extent, and he had to spend more than $1000 on his treatment. Evidently, putting into too much time on electronic devices seriously compromised his health. Nonetheless, had he spent more time exercising in his backyard, he would not get myopic or harm his spine at an extremely young age.
In addition, children should place an emphasis on their friendships, and allowing them to spend more than two hours on screen per day might affect their friendships. To be more specific, spending too much time on smartphones means that children have less time to spend with their friends. More precisely, if kids spend their whole day using his iPad to watch Youtube videos or enjoy movies, they may not have enough opportunity to meet and befriend new people. However, if they spend less time on screen during the weekend, they can spend their time having fun outside and hanging out with his friends. Most importantly, they can encounter and make acquaintance with new people. Apparently, preventing children from spending too much time on electronic devices can help them enjoy a wholesome life of friendship.
Last but not least, children should focus on their study, and spending too much time on electronic devices might affect their learning. To elaborate, putting into too much time on watching cartoons or entertaining programs on TV might make young people become lazy. Also, a significant number of video games are purposely designed to be addictive. As a result, if kids play too many of those games, they might eventually spend less time on their study. Nonetheless, if adults disallow them to use electronic devices for more than 2 hours, they can have more time to study. What’s more, they can also prevent their kids from watching too many shows that might have negative impact on their intelligence. Clearly, allowing children to use electronic devices for more than 2 hours will affect their learning ability.
In conclusion, I completely agree with these experts. This is because adults should focus on children’s health, friendship, as well as study.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching films as they learn by reading books 76
- Imagine you are working on a group project with two coworkers and the deadline the time that the project should be submitted is approaching The project looks good but could be improved if you all work on it more however this would mean that you miss the d 88
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet Mars some think 3
- In times of economic crisis in which field do you think the government can cut financial support 1 Art 2 Scientific research 3 Parks and public gardens 90
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99776785714 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59901861476 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473214285714 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1103514252 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.56 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.92 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185853802335 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560492606369 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553746439426 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11213681874 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424040273711 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.