four day work week vs five day work week
The lecture and the passage both discuss whether or not shorter weekend benefits company and employee. While the reading states four-day work-week advantage financially both workers and company, the lecture refutes this, saying that shorter work-week won't affect company profit.
First of all, the reading claims that shorter work-week employees get enough rest and fewer mistakes and the company can hire freshers without spending extra money. However, the lecture argues with limited working hours company should spend extra money. Furthermore, the professor states that although the company doesn't spend money on the salary they have to invest money on employee training, insurance, space, and training.
In addition, the passage makes the argument that shorter working hours reduce the unemployment rate. the full-time workers shift their work to new employees which generate employment. The professor counters this point by stating that hiring a new employee costs more. According to professor company expects the same work regardless of working days which leads to no additional jobs and the current job become unpleasant.
lastly, the reading passage argues that four-day workweek good for the employee to spend time with family and personal activities. The lecture counter this point, stating that shorter work week risk and decreases the quality of life. Moreover, the professor says that shorter work week lower job stability and hurt the job in the recession period. Besides, the company prefers a five-day working employee for promotions to continue monitoring.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 60
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 61
- Early twentieth century Chaco construction purpose. the professor refutes the reading claims mentioned in the passage. 3
- The reading passage believes that four day work weeks are beneficial for both the company and workers. But the lecture casts doubt on reading claims and he refutes each of the ideas. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the passage both discuss whether or not shorter weekend benefits company and em...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...fessor states that although the company doesnt spend money on the salary they have to ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ing hours reduce the unemployment rate. the full-time workers shift their work to n...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...and the current job become unpleasant. lastly, the reading passage argues that four-d...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for promotions to continue monitoring.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 15.1003584229 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 52.1666666667 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 239.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59832635983 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41895290052 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569037656904 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2215086812 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.923076923 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353629779997 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132111137645 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109898831817 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240114803988 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101024393485 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.