Friends have more impact on the academic performance of students than their teachers do. Do you agree or disagree? Use details and examples to support your opinion.
There has been an argument regarding the issue of whether friends have more influence on the individual’s academic performance than their teachers. This is due to the diversified learning method, as the world has become changed. Some insist that teachers have greater impact on students’ academic results. Although this is certainly true in the past, students nowadays depend more on their peers in every aspect of their lives, not to mention academic performances.
To start with, a student can become strongest competitor of his or her classmates, giving academic motivation. To elaborate, when studying, it is certainly important to be inspired by others’ passion. This is why some students form a study group or watch “Study With Me” contents on YouTube. Looking at others who are great achievers by nature can provide an individual with the willingness to be successful and to study hard. On the other hand, teachers can encourage and cultivate students, but there is one thing teachers cannot help students with: being a competitor. For example, Koreans are well known for well-systemized education program. Students are compelled to try to better their record-breaking performances. In such situation, in prestigious high school of Korea, students study while watching “Study With Me” session uploaded on YouTube. A student interviewed that such program can facilitate strong motivation.
Another reason is that students can better share up-to-date educational information with each other. In detail, peers can share information about a good online-learning sites and communities where students can write their know-hows on. However, what teachers do is to lead students, to answer their questions, and to teach them, not to share some information with them. This is certainly a valuable position, but nowadays the world is flooded with many learning methods and valuable education tools. My own experience can best attest to this. When I was a high school student, I wanted to further investigate in biotechnology. However, because my high school didn’t provide students with biotechnology courses, I had to find out another education site. My friend, who were well-known with such information, let me know about the free online courses that offer advanced biotechnology. Thanks to her, I could cultivate my educational willingness.
To sum up, my contention is that peers, not teachers have more influence on one’s academic career. By getting both information and motivation from classmates, students can definitely stand to benefit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | prakriti malla | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | prakriti malla | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | engsidal | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'become the strongest'.
Suggestion: become the strongest
...ances. To start with, a student can become strongest competitor of his or her classmates, gi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, regarding, so, well, while, for example, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51139240506 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05747538735 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567088607595 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6062584377 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7083333333 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4583333333 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194442360249 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057276983891 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648330907914 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141184460784 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798340453331 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.