Friends or colleagues sometimes need to have a serious talk about a problem such as misunderstanding. Some people prefer to have these important discussions in a public place. Others prefer to have such talks in more private places or at home. Which do you prefer?
Every relationship sometimes comes to the verge of conflict. Whether it comes to question it is better to solve our arguments in a private or a public place, some people prefer the former one, but I feel it is better to discuss our issues in public places. The following paragraph will illustrate my perspective.
First, the more private place, the less I am in control of my emotions. To clarify, in private places, there is nothing to restrict our negative emotions from being expressed. In such conflict, we experience a roller coaster of emotion and easily become angry, hurting our relationship. On the other hand, being observed by many strangers in a public place, we try to put a curb on our toxic emotions. For example, once, one of my colleagues and I have some financial issues. Since the outside was gale-force winds, we had to stay inside and discuss the subject. As our discussion continued, unfortunately, my anger got better of me, and I started to shout, which made me feel embarrassed; and It was not only we couldn't solve our problem but also worsened our relationship. Had I been in a public place, I would not air out my very intense emotions to him. Therefore, public places are better for discussion as they serve more emotional control to people.
The second reason I would like to bring about is that public places provide people with a better environment, which helps to mitigate tension and stress and suitable to large number of participants. When we go to a public place, we have more options, from a park with many beautiful scenes and fresh air to a coffee shop or restaurant with a piece of light music playing. Public places atmosphere affords peace of mind and gives us opportunity to solve our problems in a calm situation more efficiently, which is not the case with private places. Moreover, private places usually are small, and couldn’t provide enough space for meetings with large number of calleauges.
To wrap it up, I think public places are better for discussions as they give a sense of control over our emotions and provide a calming situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-30 | zahrash75588 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | zahrash75588 | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-29 | zahrash75588 | 60 | view |
- Tpo44
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 76
- If you are required to give feedbacks about your classmates colleagues would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 76
- For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 713, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...eel embarrassed; and It was not only we couldnt solve our problem but also worsened our...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, i feel, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79005524862 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74386579249 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8178689749 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239328991252 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775788547114 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457322462964 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141685648504 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402530403353 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.