The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s government to take to protect the environment.1.Fund the research to develop environmentally friendly energy sources such as solar and wind energy. 2.Preserve the natural places like forests and protect the animals that live there. 3.Enforce laws to prevent the pollution of air and water by large companies.
The last decade has witnessed tremendous advancement in our country. Almost all fields: science, technology, economy and so forth, have reformed and surged overwhelmingly at a cost of environment deteriorated to a certain extent. With the environmental issue tending to be resolved urgently, how to get this problem settled efficiently has never fail to attract the attention of government and general public. Therefore, when it comes to which is the most viable measure to preserve our nature among developing new clean energy sources, protect natural places and animal living there and enforcing legislation against the pollution by large companies. Predictably, people’s notion may vary from one to another. Towards such a long-running tug of war, I inclined to claim that funding researches could be the best.
Primarily, scientific findings generated by scientists may result in a long-term benefit, making it possible for government to not only settle critical environmental issues thoroughly but also profit from it. To be specific, nowadays environment is so unprecedentedly suffered that normally a policy cannot avert it from steadily worsening. Acid rain, land depletion, global warming and rainforest destruction all of them pop up during these decades unavoidably all over the world, hard as people try to prevent their coming. Sadly, it does not work at all. Why does these happen? Why can’t we get them ceased? Fortunately, the public realize that only we find an eco-friendly sources, would conflicts between development of our country and environmental protection not arise any more, which is the most fundamental resolution of deteriorated environment. Besides, an advanced and feasible scientific achievement might also bring enormous profits to this nation. For instance, statistical data provided by Chinese Academy of Science suggest that a normal scientific achievement about environment will convert into rewards at an average of roughly 90,000 dollars.
In addition, there are certain drawbacks for the other two options. Admittedly, preserving the natural places and passing laws may also be conducive to our environment in some degrees. To illustrate, if the habitats were protected, a number of wild animals and forests would be well preserved. Also, laws associated with preventing the pollution may prohibit some factories from producing waste air and water. However, in comparison to what I proposed above, these two measures are unlikely to be of vital importance. The underlying reason is that both of them might not be long-lasting and thorough effectively. To be elaborate, building habitats could only assure a certain quantity of places to be preserved. In other words, from the perspective of the whole world, it does not work due to serious pollutions. For another thing, habitats may occupy lands impeding the development at some fields. As for legislating laws, obviously, it could effect at a limited extent. What is more, in reality, factories cannot operate without releasing pollutions, unless there is a new clean resource found for them.
Considering what I mentioned above, it is self-evident that to fund the research is the best key to environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | Monster_Miu | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | SERDARKOCAK | 66 | view |
| 2016-10-04 | Delara | 86 | view |
| 2016-10-03 | Delara | 86 | view |
| 2016-09-29 | shshadi | 70 | view |
- TPO 36 3
- As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters, the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break: 1、Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to 90
- A government should focus its budget more on young children education than universities 76
- Do you agree or disagree: Company should pay for employees to get university degree? 88
- TPO 39 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'failed'.
Suggestion: failed
...s problem settled efficiently has never fail to attract the attention of government ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...attract the attention of government and general public. Therefore, when it comes to which is t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 730, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... vary from one to another. Towards such a long-running tug of war, I inclined to claim that fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 697, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'conflict'
Suggestion: conflict
... we find an eco-friendly sources, would conflicts between development of our country and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 944, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...r legislating laws, obviously, it could effect at a limited extent. What is more, in r...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, another thing, as for, for instance, in addition, for another thing, in other words, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2726.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48490945674 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07706731463 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599597585513 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 854.1 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6943911295 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.962962963 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4074074074 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160003046924 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355113272211 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495264127873 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111005514026 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481774791979 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 86.8835125448 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.