The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s government to take to protect the environment?
1. Fund research to develop environmentally friendly energy sources such as solar and wind energy.
2. Preserve the natural places like forests and protect the animals that live there.
3. Enforce laws to prevent the pollution of air and water by large companies.
At the turn of the new century, one of the rigors of modern life is reducing pollution of air and water in megacities and no one can turn a blind eye to the pivotal role of government in this activity. Actually, there are unlimited ways to decline cities’ pollution. Although some people adhere to this belief that government should either enact restrict laws or maintain natural places, in my vantage point, it is highly beneficial that government allocate budget to develop environmentally energy such as solar and wind energy since researchers can explore effective ways and also motivate people easily to follow these strategies.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes government to invest in environmental projects is exploring fundamental ways to solve air and water pollution. It is absolutely undeniable that there are numerous factors which feature large in air and water pollution. That is why scientist need to do divers experiments in order to find critical reasons of air pollution. Although at first find carrying out these projects is useless, they will soon find its tangible benefits through dramatic influences on natural environment. According to recent research conducted in my country, experts believe that global warming is one the most important factor which leads to tarp CO2 gas in the atmosphere, so they can find potential solutions to cope with this problem and reduce air pollution dramatically.
The further subtle point is that researches can fortify people’s motivation to follow innovative strategies to decline air and water pollution. Without a shadow of doubt, air and water pollution leave negative effects on people’s health in modern life. In this way, there is need to expand people’s knowledge and broaden their horizons about adverse effects of air and water pollution on their health. Undoubtedly, researchers are by far the most effective consultant which can instill these valuable concepts into people. Moreover, they can get incentives to people not only obey rules related to air pollution, but also collaborate in environmentally projects. For example, scientists can inspire people to ride bicycle instead of using their own cars in the way to destination. In addition, they can motivate companies to produce environmentally friendly products.
On the whole, according to the above-mentioned points and details, it is crystal-clear that allocating budget to environmentally researches has lots of merits since researchers can find effective solutions and also can strengthen to people’ tendencies. It is high time overlooking the fact that government can reduce air and water pollution just by hampering companies’ activities or forcing people to follow restricted rules. How can governments solve air pollution’s problem forever? Undoubtedly, the answer of this question is by investing in environmental projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | Monster_Miu | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | SERDARKOCAK | 66 | view |
| 2016-10-04 | Delara | 86 | view |
| 2016-10-03 | Delara | 86 | view |
| 2016-09-29 | shshadi | 70 | view |
- integrated 48 60
- Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes. 70
- People who develop different skills are more successful than people who develop one skill only. 70
- People who develop different skills are more successful than people who develop one skill only. 70
- integrated 46 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and reduce air pollution dramatically. The further subtle point is that researc...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as', 'on the whole']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.288801571709 0.229887763892 126% => OK
Verbs: 0.145383104126 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.090373280943 0.0866891130778 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.049115913556 0.046263068375 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0275049115914 0.0685040099705 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106090373281 0.118717715034 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0255402750491 0.0351676179071 73% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.16932766919 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Infinitives: 0.049115913556 0.0309702414327 159% => OK
Particles: 0.00196463654224 0.00188951952338 104% => OK
Determiners: 0.0530451866405 0.0887237588012 60% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0275049115914 0.0209618222197 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0137524557957 0.0139019557991 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2917.0 2387.08602151 122% => OK
No of words: 448.0 408.028673835 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.51116071429 5.86048508987 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.428571428571 0.338922669872 126% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.339285714286 0.251872472559 135% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263392857143 0.174417080927 151% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.196428571429 0.112833075102 174% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16932766919 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529017857143 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 61.5327374508 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5789473684 20.5533526081 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.8140446323 48.84282405 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.526315789 120.699889404 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5789473684 20.5533526081 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.736842105263 0.644075263715 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 57.507518797 45.7405998639 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.89380530973 1.45489161554 130% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39896643436 0.300154397459 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105744518251 0.103427244359 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0753814528633 0.0752933317313 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.509186977499 0.497263757937 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149993808271 0.151897553556 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163143337359 0.114077575197 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10240941417 0.0781384742642 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.463977003869 0.336927656856 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0416831357373 0.067059652881 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316993520123 0.210909579961 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332915800947 0.0618886996521 54% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 13.6433691756 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.