The government should control the amount of violence in films and televisions in order to decrease violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Films and televisions have great impacts on humans. They make our lives more interesting and vivid. However, there is an ongoing debate whether violent films and series are attributed to the occurring crimes. Many people blame the films for deteriorating the morality of the present society, but personally, I feel ambiguous about the physiological effects of the films
To begin with, films will create a misconception in people that fighting is the only way to resolve conflicts. Some viewers are usually captivated by the amazing feature of the fight without being cognizant of the actual peaceful meaning that the directors want to convey to the viewers themselves. Additionally, people will often try to imitate what they saw, so when the viewers watch movies with flamboyant actions like flying kicks or motor racing, they might replicate actions in real life, which not only mutilate themselves but also put other people in the line of death and life.
On the other hand, films, besides its purpose to entertain the viewers and bring profits to the filmmakers, help reduce crimes. The reason is that a film can be a useful illustration of a circumstance that may occur in real life. With proper guidance, the viewers, especially inexperienced ones, know how to cope with situations when they happen. For example, parents can teach their children methods to avoid or run away from kidnappers or perverts by showing them films that demonstrate those cases and their tragic consequences, giving them better visualization of crimes.
To sum up, it is certain that the government should take measures to prevent inexperienced viewers, notably kids, from violent products by putting age limits. However, for other people, violent films are a must-watch since they are full of dramatic actions and gunfights as well as blowing up things.
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion 70
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world is this a negative or positive development 84
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Going green is a good choice or not 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, well, for example, i feel, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18456375839 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74753534968 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637583892617 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1321058758 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.45110844103 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103643340966 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399930938604 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037847740034 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677828905848 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415613154181 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.