Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. What is your opinion?
Scientists report that the environment is being destroyed seriously and the major reason comes from human activity. That environmental degradation has a close parallel with social development, according to some people, is neither avoidable nor changeable. However, many activists around the world still have faith in saving the planet. I acclaim this belief as well as I am willing to be a part of the “Save the Earth Campaign” of these activists due to these rational reasons.
First of all, it is human actions to adversely affect the environment; thereby, it is also human actions to change the influence that they have caused. Current environmental issues are mainly caused by humans, namely overusing plastic materials which leads to plastic pollution, cutting too many trees for cultivation which results in soil erosion and flood, and dumping untreated sewage water into lakes which leads to water pollution. Nevertheless, if people are cognizant that it is time to halt their negative environmental affected behaviors, they are totally capable of creating positive environmental influenced behaviors. Let’s start from modifying their own lifestyle. For example, students at high schools are rushing to buy metal straws and private bottles so that the amount of plastic trash can be abated.
Secondly, abolishing the idea of being “can’t”, which needs great effort, is also a fabulous solution to solve problems. Now that a meditation that minor alternatives which derive from a single person cannot show major differences, they feel like they are in a temporary about with the blue. However, I have to emphasize that major changes come from petty ones. For instance, I used to utilize nylon material to protect my notebooks, but then I realized that I was harming the environment by continuing to use this pollutant. As a result, I changed my habit as well as encouraged all my classmates to stop the action. Hence, we had been able to prevent nearly over one hundred nylons being used. Obviously, if people are consistent while trying to save the planet, and better, everyone around the world should execute it together, fruits will come sooner than they expect.
In short, to change the reality of environmental degradation requires powerful progress from every single individual and they should start to change their awareness and lifestyle.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 80
- What causes global warming The only way to deal with is from governments not individuals What are your opinion 76
- Topic Some people think that the media should not report details of crimes to the public To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- In many countries the most common solution for criminal behaviour is prison but many believe that a better education is more effective To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Is it good or not to let people work until they can t Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in short, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28116710875 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83847887733 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618037135279 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3039415553 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.117647059 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201995264691 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586909897529 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343998843418 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113768736393 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316326026582 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.