If your friend makes a mistake, do you prefer to say nothing or do something even if it ends your friendship?
Without a shadow of doubt the way that people manage their relationships with their friends play a prominent role in every individual’s life. Some people are proponents of the claim that when we face a friend’s mistake, we should just ignore it; however, others hold the opposite perspective and believe that it is our responsibility to react to a friend’s wrong action even at the cost of losing the mentioned friend. The idea to which I subscribe is the latter one. My viewpoint is based on quite a few reasons, two ones of which have been elaborated upon hereunder.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that as a friend it is one of our rudimentary duties to be help our friends be a better version of themselves. By making them aware of their mistakes, our friends can get familiar with their flaws and try to make it right. Moreover, if they hear from the people who they regard them as friends, they would really think about what their opinion is, because of the fact that friends trust each other. My own experience is a good example of this matter. I always use my sense of humor to communicate with others, yet sometimes I overuse this technique without even realizing it. One day I was talking to my professor and after he left, one of my close friends told me that I should not use my sense of humor while discussing serious matters, for it would make me look cheap. At first I was even offended by his opinion, but after I got home, I really thought about what he said and realized that he was right and eventually I tried to manage my sense of humor.
The second noteworthy reason is that doing something about our friend’s mistake can strengthen our friendship. The fact is friendship does not happen by its own, for it needs individuals to spend time and energy to make it stronger. Furthermore, the thing that differentiates a friendship from a regular relationship is honesty and it is not always easy to be honest but it is necessary for us to be honest in order to fortify our friendship with our friends. A case in point is my own friendship with the person, who I already mentioned in the last paragraph. After he illuminated me of my wrong action, our friendship became stronger, for I had this feeling that he is trustworthy and I felt as I should try to be a trustable friend for him too and make him aware of the possible wrong actions, which he might take.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that we should make our friends aware of the mistakes they make as it would assist them to be a better version of themselves and it can eventually strengthen our friendship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | shahabaddin_solaimanian | 71 | view |
- how agnostids behaved and what they ate 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television programs should present stories in which good people are rewarded and bad people are punished. 78
- humans challenges while going to the Mars 73
- ancient people used vessels as batteries 73
- Which one do you think is the most important for high school teacher (age from 15 to 18)?o the ability to give students advice to plan for their futureo the ability to find which students need help and provide them with helpo the ability to encourage s 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ally think about what their opinion is, because of the fact that friends trust each other. My own exper...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, so, then, while, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 91.0 43.0788530466 211% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72594142259 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00592017529 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506276150628 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.115675539 48.9658058833 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.357142857 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1428571429 20.6045352989 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143589837246 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489554609639 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034885847252 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929700118227 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223402834475 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.