if your neighborhood were to build a park, would you support the plan? Explain why or why not.
Many people think that building a park in their neighborhood will be disturbing. They say that this will means more people coming to their neighborhood which may make it less safe. Although I understand their opinion, I have a different point of view. I believe that building a park close to our house is an amazing idea because this will help all the neighbors to get out, and it will increase the social connection between them.
First, parks are a great place to go out. Having a park in the neighborhood will make it easier for new mothers to get their young children to have some fun. Kids love parks and like to run freely all over the place. At a neighborhood park, mothers will not be worried about their small ones. Also for the older people, especially the retired ones, who have nothing to do all the morning until the rest of their families come back from their work, They can go out have a walk around the park, enjoy the nice weather, get some sunlight that can support their bone health. A park in the neighborhood is like an escaping gate for young moms with little ones and for the elder people from staying at their houses going nothing.
Second, the park is one of the best places for social gatherings, it also reinforces the social connections between neighbors. For example, neighbors can do small marathons among them at the park, which after they can hang out enjoy exchanging talks while they have a light snack. Also, a lot of birthday parties take place at parks, where it is an open area for the kids to play and for the adults to spend time together far from the limited spaces at houses. One of the most events I really enjoyed attending took place at the park where the kids have different activities to do, also there were many fun things and activities for adults there too, I also got a chance to build new connection with the people. It ends up both me and my kids had a blast that day. That is why I vote yes for parks.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I urge every Home Owner Association, to consider a park as an important part of their little community. This will enhance the relationship between the neighbors, at the same time it works as a breathing spot for those people with limited access to the outer world. If you tried so, You will never regret the decision of building a park ever.
- face to face communication versus other types of communication 73
- Is it better to use a tour guide in your trip or do it by yourself 70
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 70
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 71
- TPO 41- task 1 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
... be disturbing. They say that this will means more people coming to their neighborhoo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... not be worried about their small ones. Also for the older people, especially the re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, really, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48484848485 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35571515363 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522144522145 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4127528387 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.263157895 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140966060509 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550126625202 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478939702909 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895401808204 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00938860221209 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.