Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life. Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone?
Although many believe students learn better when they work alone, I, on the other hand, believe students learn better when they are in group. Thus, I believe it is better for the professor to require students to work together in a group. I will address the most discernible reasons why I feel this way in the following.
To begin with, people attend university for many reasons and I believe one of the most important reason of attending university is to learn social skill. Group activity will provide opportunity for students to learn important skill such as whitstand critics, making friend, proper communication skill and so on. Therefore, when professor require students to work together to learn new subject, he try to teach them those skill. For instance, when I attend university I had only one friends. Because the lack of some social skills, I could not interact well with other people. In the first university semester, my physics professor gave students very hard assignment about Gravity. He told us we should finish our assignments in pairs. Hence, I forced to cooperate with one of my classmate to finish my assignment. At the beginning I could not interact well with him and experienced very hard time, because I used to do my work alone. But after two weeks, I tried to dealt with him, and gradually I learnt how to work in a team, because my grades depend on that. After that, I put my knowledge in to account and I made a lot of friends. This example illustrate how group activity improve students social skills.
Moreover, learning is progressive, which means people need a lot of time to learn new subject. People can boost learning process by group study. While people studying in a group, they try to fix each others and it prevents them from misunderstanding. Not only that but also they help each other save motivation. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. As I mentioned before I made a lot of friends in university and I studied with them in university library. However I got high grades but some times I had problems with my lessons. Consequently, when I could not understand some part of my cources, I asked my friends and they address my problems very fast. Addmitedly, when I lost my motivation, my friends talks about their wishes and talks about high grades job opportunity, thus I did not loss my motivation.
In conclusion, it is for all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe it is more beneficial for students to work together in a group to learn new subject. This is because it improves students social skills, and because they learn faster in a group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-02 | ardavan2 | 70 | view |
| 2017-01-12 | Hamed.Baghal | 66 | view |
| 2017-01-10 | Hamed.Baghal | 70 | view |
- Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life. Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should spend most of their time on studying and playing, and they shouldn’t be required to help family with household chores, such as cleaning and cooking. 63
- Agree or disagree Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 69
- Agree or disagree It is better for the younger people to take risk and explore new things than the older people 89
- The government wants to make investment to improve education Which one of the following investments do you think is the best 1 to hire more teachers to teach in a small class 2 preschool education before kindergarten 3 to provide some training courses so 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
Although many believe students learn better when they work alone, I, on the other h...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... the other hand, believe students learn better when they are in group. Thus, I believe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
... work together to learn new subject, he try to teach them those skill. For instance...
^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this skill' or 'those skills'?
Suggestion: this skill; those skills
...learn new subject, he try to teach them those skill. For instance, when I attend university...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...tudied with them in university library. However I got high grades but some times I had ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79470198675 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75995579021 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465783664459 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5745439284 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5384615385 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4230769231 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282350644893 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875406269486 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137298467078 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230336459413 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134415188366 0.0645574589148 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.