Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life. Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone?
Living in modern era, attending university is a so much promising step toward being successful in future career for students. Professors typically adopt different approaches to teach lessons such as putting students in a group, requiring students to give oral presentation and writing paper regarding the topic, doing several homework and so forth. When it comes to the issue whether student should work collectively or individually, different people will adopt different attitudes towards this issue depending on their characters and educational backgrounds. On the one hand, there are people who believe that students will learn more regarding a subject working on individually since they can further concentrate on the topic and also save their time; on the other hand, others believe that working collectively has more outstanding merits. As far as I am personally concerned, the latter carries further weight since not only does it increase the effectiveness of their study but also does it improve their communication skills.
Working in a group, students deeply understand the topic absorbing information in different ways. As a matter a fact, working in a group with students who have different talents and skills gives the whole group the chance to hear distinct ideas regarding the topic, as a result of which they can discuss further concern the topic, share their ideas and finally chose the effective way to attack the problems. Therefore, students will not forget those lessons which they have learned from a long discussion with their friends. Moreover, working collectively allow students to go beyond the project and explore more about particular topic. Since some academic projects necessitate having several skills so as to carry out the project such as computer, experimental and theoretical skills, which cannot be done all by one person. Therefore, they will not only learn regarding the topic but also improve their skills working with students who are expert on such skills.
Students also improve their communication skills working in a group. In fact, participating in discussion regarding the topic makes student confidence and teach them how to prepare their self for an oral presentation. In fact, socializing with group members in a scientific environment prepare students to confidently talk in public. For instance, I remember that we had a group in high school and everyone should lecture regarding scientific topic every week, as a result of which when I attend to university I hadn't problem in my presentation. Moreover, students learn how to socialize and make friend in university to enjoy their life. In fact, they understand that being literate is not just for being successful in future career but also is for how to live and spend their time together. Therefore, working together allow students enormously develop their skills and socially growing up.
To wrap it up, working collectively not only does it allow student to obtain a panoramic view with respect to the topic but also does it prepare them to become a sociable person even in their real life. I think if university wants to increase the effectiveness of learning, they should consider further teamwork for students during their educational programs.
- Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 73
- The government should give priority to improving healthcare than to solving environmental problem. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun homework seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some homework'.
Suggestion: some homework
...riting paper regarding the topic, doing several homework and so forth. When it comes to the issu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...jects necessitate having several skills so as to carry out the project such as computer,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 865, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to regard'.
Suggestion: to regard
...n. Therefore, they will not only learn regarding the topic but also improve their skills...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
... of which when I attend to university I hadnt problem in my presentation. Moreover, s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents during their educational programs.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, as a result, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2747.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30308880309 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82348232579 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471042471042 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 841.5 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7179998087 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.35 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266425997423 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100332853432 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598793515202 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17316805242 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293467054267 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.