Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life, is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or alone? Which option do you prefer and why? Use details and examples to explain your answers.
Living in the modern era, attending university is a so much promising step toward being successful in a career for students. Professors adopt approaches to teach lessons. According to me group discussions are more helpful rather than studying alone. I will elaborate on my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
Working in a group, students deeply understand by absorbing all the information about the topic. Group study will give chance students to listen to other students’ distinct ideas. After sharing their ideas, finally, they can choose an effective way to attack the problems. Therefore, students will not forget those lessons which they have learned from a long discussion with their friends. Moreover, working collectively allow students to go beyond the project and explore more about a particular topic. Since some academic projects cause having several skills to carry out the project such as the computer, experimental and theoretical skills, which cannot be done all by one person. Therefore, they will not only learn about the topic but also improve their skills working with students who are expert on such skills.
Students also improve their communication skills by working in a group. In fact, participating in a discussion on the topic makes student confidence and teach them how to prepare their self for an oral presentation. In fact, socializing with group members in a scientific environment prepare students to confidently talk in public. For instance, I remember that we had a group in high school and everyone should lecture on the scientific topic every week, as a result of which when I attend to university I hadn't a problem in my presentation. Moreover, students learn how to socialize and make a friend in university to enjoy their life.
Let’s put in a nutshell, working together not only allow the student to understand the whole topic but also prepare them to become a sociable person even in their real life. Based on my reasons, I strongly believe that to cover the topic in a short period of time professors should advise students to do group study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...sors adopt approaches to teach lessons. According to me group discussions are more helpful rath...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
... of which when I attend to university I hadnt a problem in my presentation. Moreover,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ieve that to cover the topic in a short period of time professors should advise students to do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12536443149 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82503828578 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559766763848 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.727567936 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254509139729 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853183505355 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534500231236 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152261786843 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469747331136 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.