Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life, is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or alone? Which option do you prefer and why? Use details and examples to explain your answers.
Living in the modern era, attending university is a so much promising step toward being successful in a career for students. Professors adopt approaches to teach lessons. According to me group discussions are more helpful rather than studying alone. I will elaborate on my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
Working in a group, students deeply understand by absorbing all the information about the topic. Group study will give chance to students to listen to other students’ distinct ideas. After sharing their ideas, finally, they can choose an effective way to attack the problems. Therefore, students will not forget those lessons which they have learned from a long discussion with their friends. Moreover, working collectively allow students to go beyond the project and explore more about a particular topic. Since some academic projects necessitate having several skills so as to carry out the project. If students do projects with the other students who are expert in skills, students can learn new skills from others.
Students also improve their communication skills by working in a group. In fact, participating in a discussion regarding the topic makes student confidence and teach them how to prepare their self for an oral presentation. In fact, socializing with group members in a scientific environment prepare students to confidently talk in public. For instance, I remember that we had a group in high school and everyone should lecture regarding scientific topic every week, as a result of which when I attend to university I hadn't a problem in my presentation. Moreover, students can cover their work in a short period of time. In teamwork, work get divided and students can focus on other subjects as well. Further, group study will help students quickly revise the whole topic. For instance, in my high school, I use to do a revision before an exam with my study group. It helps me to cover my whole course syllabuses in less time.
Let’s put in a nutshell, working together not only allow the student to understand the whole topic but also prepare them to become a sociable person even in their real life. Based on my reasons, I strongly believe that to cover the topic in a short period of time professors should advise students to do group study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...sors adopt approaches to teach lessons. According to me group discussions are more helpful rath...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...jects necessitate having several skills so as to carry out the project. If students do p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
... of which when I attend to university I hadnt a problem in my presentation. Moreover,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...tudents can cover their work in a short period of time. In teamwork, work get divided and stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 808, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...pic. For instance, in my high school, I use to do a revision before an exam with my...
^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ieve that to cover the topic in a short period of time professors should advise students to do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06878306878 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78393874588 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542328042328 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8298032024 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86363636364 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281868862013 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879367044523 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589613248837 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168871500771 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530327399927 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.