Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is o | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics

Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o

There are varieties of situations we may confront in daily life, in which one of the most awkward situations must be to correct others. From my own perspective, I prefer to wait until the class, meeting or stuff like that is over and talk to the teacher or leader in private. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will illuminate in the following essay.

First of all, it is the most efficient manner to discuss the rightness of contradictory opinions. To begin with, most students, for example, might leave the classroom after class, and the discussion will not supersede others' class time. Furthermore, the form of mature thoughts and articulating expression requires time. It seems impossible to figure out everything clearly in such a short moment. Therefore, I have a tendency to think twice before speaking loudly, which has given me a reputation for unimpeachable logic. Finally, the vital part of privately expressing is that we could provide more reaction time to others, which could offer them an opportunity to rethink their speech and give positive feedback, regardless of whether or not they are going to correct their previous opinions. In a word, efficiency. Only in this way can we save precious time and catch the rare chance to find a meaningful conclusion.

Secondly, we could learn something from interpersonal communication with someone superior to us. When someone is releasing a speech, it means he is professional in his field or he is famous. As a result, it is not sensible to make him embarrassed in public. Imagine that if we ignore others' dignity and directly throw our challenging thoughts on his face, the endless denial and argument would follow right after it, which are meaningless and time-wasting. In fact, we could learn a lot from those who are experts in their fields; and the incorrect part of their expression could become a perfect beginning of an inspiring conversation and an invaluable chance to access them.

In conclusion, I would choose to wait for an appropriate time before talking about others' errors. This is because it will boost the efficiency of interactions; and because we should choose a wise approach to turn an embarrassing situation into a marvelous opportunity that allows us to acquire more understanding.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...d give positive feedback, regardless of whether or not they are going to correct their previou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...n fact, we could learn a lot from those who are experts in their fields; and the incorr...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, talking about, as a result, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03439153439 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95065114977 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7472196605 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.722222222 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127604939432 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346963896164 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519034850565 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802733210505 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684991323017 0.0645574589148 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.