Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
-Say nothing.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of correcting mistake a by teacher or a meeting leader engendered copious controversies among people. Some people may hold the view that our teacher wrong opinion about something should be interrupted and corrected or do not mention any thing. However, others may take an opposite view point and believe that it is more beneficial in correcting his mistake after the meeting. As far as I am concerned, it is better to wait until the meeting or class is over and then talk to our teacher or meeting leader and correct him. In following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the outstanding reason.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that it is not good for our meeting leader's spirit to point out his mistakes in front of other people and it is possible our employer lose his confident. Also it might has negative effects on his self-esteem. For instance, when me and my friend worked in a company, we had a meeting about our research and in meeting our manager make a wrong decision and my friend interrupt him and correct him and for one week our manager did not come to company and he was shamed because of his fatal and he never attend another meeting because he lost his confident to talk in front of other people. Moreover, the development in technology which is happening at a very fast pace make our life hectic and it is arduous to find a job. Discontinuing your manager may cause her to become upset or angry with you and it is feasible that he fired you from his office.
Another reason which deserve some words here is that it is a chance that you misunderstand your manager opinion and it is better to wait and talk to him after meeting. For instance, my friend always talk about his experiences in one meeting which he anticipated. He asserts that her meeting leader says something wrong in a meeting and after interrupting him, he find out he misunderstand whose manager's opinion and it has negative influence on my friend because his colleague think he did not focus on their manager speak. Additionally, correct your manager's mistake after meeting are helping you to building a better friend ship with your manager or even building a profound friend ship witch your manager since you gave him a chance to correct his mistake in another meeting and this helps employees when they make mistake they have a chance to correct themselves.
To make a long story short, based on aforementioned argument, it is more advantage to correct your manager after meeting. Consequently, it is highly recommended that other employees to do not interrupt their boss during his speech and think about their action because it has a momentous effects on their future. In fact, there are a myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but are not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...rrupted and corrected or do not mention any thing. However, others may take an opposite v...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ssible our employer lose his confident. Also it might has negative effects on his se...
^^^^
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'attends'.
Suggestion: attends
...hamed because of his fatal and he never attend another meeting because he lost his con...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
... meeting and after interrupting him, he find out he misunderstand whose managers opi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'misunderstands'.
Suggestion: misunderstands
... after interrupting him, he find out he misunderstand whose managers opinion and it has negat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...their action because it has a momentous effects on their future. In fact, there are a m...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...s on their future. In fact, there are a myriad of other reasons, challenging the above...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 84.0 43.0788530466 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.758 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66897658289 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.5408932396 48.9658058833 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.941176471 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4117647059 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301855273535 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101022544453 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715497403352 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196688632068 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105037816977 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.