Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader; 3. Say nothing.
It is generally, everyone may be faced with the situation that the teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrectly and they want to know what the proper action is. Responding to this problem has played a pivotal role in people interact with others. Due to its paramount importance, there is a long-standing discussion among people that what the best reaction in this situation is. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to a great extent on the belief that, waiting until the meeting is over then talking to the lecturer is the best option. In the ensuing paragraphs, I will represent cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justify the thesis is that respecting the lecturer, which shows our nice characteristic. To put it in general words, if we interrupt and correct the mistake during a presentation, we bother the speaker. Needless to say, when we say nothing we let the lecturer to remain in that mistake and continues to repeat it in the future lectures. To shed more light on the issue, according to a study conducted in my university recently reveals that when the lecture has 10% mistake content, it profoundly mislead the student in their understanding and goals.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, another equally noteworthy in corroborating my stance is holding the silence during the meeting. To clarify, the lecturer wants to transfer him/her knowledge to the listeners and interrupting him/her speaking has a bad influence on presentation. I remember that, when I was in a class in my university 3 years ago, a student interrupted the dean speaking during the speaking; he left the meeting because the interruption bothered him. However, what I mentioned above might not be overgeneralized to all contexts.
Drawing upon the reasons, although there are always some exceptions, which are excluded from the general rule? I do agree that, waiting until the class or meeting is over and then talking with lecturer is a good choice. However, that was the story in a nutshell. In fact, there is a myriad of other reasons, challenging the above claim, which could be mentioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'misleads'?
Suggestion: misleads
... has 10% mistake content, it profoundly mislead the student in their understanding and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, then, in fact, in general, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.972899729 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90560911295 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7059219381 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.941176471 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214282260017 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541516180829 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580707321751 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113138115096 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276842541756 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.