Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. the teacher or the meeting leaders say something incorrect. in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do？
1.interrupt and correct the mistake right away
2.wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone
3.say nothing
Currently, society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus citizens become more proficient in critical thinking and they are not fully convinced of the knowledge or information imparted in classes or meetings, which triggers a heated discussion that when there comes a mistake committed during a class or a meeting, should we correct the mistakes and when should we express our different notions. A bunch of individuals reckon that they are inclined to say nothing about it since they think that this kind of behaviors is not abiding by etiquettes and get teachers or leaders annoyed. While others contend that they probably interrupt and correct the mistake once it occurs. However, from my own perspective, I harbor the idea that we ought to point out the mistakes when the class or meeting is over for the reasons as follows.
To start with, pinpointing the mistakes committed in the meeting or class enables both the individuals delivering speeches and listeners to have a grasp of truth or better comprehension. For individuals who give speeches, provided that they impart wrong information without being informed of their mistakes, they are likely to commit the same mistakes, which misguides more listeners. With regard to listeners, since they tend to regard teachers or meeting leaders as the dominant authorities, they may follow those leaders or teachers blindly owing to the dearth of independent thinking, therefore the synonymous mistakes will emerge in future time. If the mistakes can be pinpointed by us, not only can we possess the truth or profound knowledge, but also ensure that no more individuals will be misguided by wrong information. However, a myriad of individuals, for the sake of the fear of annoying teachers or meeting leaders, opt for not telling the mistakes, personally speaking, provided that we behave complying with the rudimentary principles about courtesy, most teachers and leaders are open-minded enough to adopt our suggestions and even feel enlightened since we attach sufficient attention to their speeches.
What's more, pointing out the mistakes after classes or meetings is the optimal approach. Initially, instead of pinpointing the mistakes teachers or leaders make during the process of giving speeches, pointing out problems after class or meeting shows our respect for their efforts. To be more specific, it is not courteous for us to interrupt them, which probably delays the procession of delivering significant contents. Apart from that, it is more acceptable for teachers and leaders to admit their mistakes. Sometimes, owing to their dignity as authoritative entities, they feel ashamed to admit their mistakes in front of a large number of listeners, or there is a probability that they fail to act quickly to recognize their faults, which gives rise to some avoidable misunderstandings. Hence, pointing out mistakes after classes or meetings contributes to our etiquettes and their realization of their faults.
Admittedly, some teachers and leaders feel irritated by our behaviors of correcting mistakes, nevertheless, if we act appropriately to demonstrate our etiquettes, most of them feel glad to receive feedback from their listeners and interact with us.
In a nutshell, from what has been mentioned above, when there comes a mistake committed by teachers or meeting leaders in front of lots of listeners, the preferred option is point out the mistakes after classes or meetings since for one thing, it enables us to have a better understanding of the imparted information, for another, it shows our respect for people delivering speeches and renders them sufficient time to figure out the problems.
- There are two companies, which are both willing to offer you a job with the same rate of pay.One offers interesting and challenging projects but gives almost no vacation days, and the job of another company does not seem like interesting or challenging bu 90
- Children should spend most of the tie playing and studying, and they should not be required to do household chores, like cooking or cleaning. 73
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is difficult for teachers to be both popular ( well-liked ) and effective to help students learning. 90
- Some people prefer to play team sports, while others prefer to play individual sports. Which do you prefer and why. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ufficient attention to their speeches. Whats more, pointing out the mistakes after c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...med to admit their mistakes in front of a large number of listeners, or there is a probability th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, kind of, for one thing, to start with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3117.0 1977.66487455 158% => OK
No of words: 584.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33732876712 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96666234214 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467465753425 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 948.6 618.680645161 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.223051615 48.9658058833 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 183.352941176 100.406767564 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3529411765 20.6045352989 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212989711169 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844210432978 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040638785901 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128304590375 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395150502405 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 11.7677419355 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.1575268817 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 10.002688172 280% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 10.247311828 273% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.