To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not universities ought to allocate a large part of the budget for the salary of their professors or teachers to improve the quality of education has received a great deal of attention from university managers and education experts. Although some may say that have high technology and equipped laboratories and libraries is the best way for improving the quality of education; I, as well as many others, believe that teachers and professors have a great influence on the quality of education because they are becoming fundamental of education, teaching students, so they need enthusiastic by increasing wage.
First of all, an important reason why improving the salary of teachers has an important influence on the quality of education is that teachers translate the fundamental of knowledge to the students. Many educational experts believe that teachers and professors have the biggest influence on the quality of education. They have duties that translate and teach all aspect of lessons to students; hence, if they do not teach lessons in the best ways, students would not learn lectures at the acceptable level. So, the quality of education will decrease. In other words, increasing the salary of the educators makes enthusiastic on them for teaching the lessons in the best way. As a result, the quality of the educational system will be increased. Nevertheless, if universities start to equip the facilities of the university such as gyms, laboratories, and libraries, the university only attract more students; however, the number of students cannot determine of quality of the educational systems.
Another reason for this point of view is that professors must focus on teaching for improving the grade of educational systems. Consider a situation that a professor does not have a high wage, for instance. When the professor does not earn enough money from the university, she must select a second job for earning extra money for improving her quality of life. In this situation, she had to plan and managing the second job, and she may consume and separate time till she can manage a second job. As a result, the professor does not focus on academic position so that she would not teach and transfer information to their students, and the level of learning will be decreased. However, if the university allocates enough wages to professors and has a high quality of laboratories and libraries, they will convert the university to a flourishing and successful one.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I believe that for improving education condition, the university must increase the salary of their teachers and professors chiefly due to the valuable influence of good professors on the university and education quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not universities ought to allocate a large ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 867, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty to a flourishing and successful one. In conclusion, considering the ideas pre...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2371.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19956140351 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93571392398 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436403508772 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.5507212203 48.9658058833 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.1875 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446302150772 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160070084077 0.076458572812 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106806863376 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312563035936 0.150856017488 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312972722702 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.5 10.002688172 305% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 31.0 10.247311828 303% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.