It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.
Without any doubt, choosing and commencing a job is an inevitable juncture in the life of most people, since even a simple life is not possible without an occupation in today’s modern world. Different individuals are inclined to various jobs according to their personality, skill, age, societies' cultures, to name but a few. With this in mind, some believe that it does not recommend for children to select jobs which are similar to their parents' occupations, while others hold the opposite view. I, personally, subscribe to the latter attitude based on quite a few reasons, three of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that particularly for individuals starting a career, the first year of work is full of difficulties owing to the fact that people are not familiar with the workplace's atmosphere, rules, co-workers, to name but a few. Enjoying parents, especially with the same work, who has previously experienced all these hardships, is invaluable. It is crystal clear that parents are closet people in the life of anyone; hence, parents can help their children to get accustomed with initial jobs' difficulties easier. It is statistically proven that there are a great deal of individuals who abandon their works in the first month, which is indicative of the importance of having a person to assist during this time.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the first perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that it is undisputable that parents have experiences about at least half of the age of their children-- or, to put it in another way, the more time on works, the more knowledge he or she will acquire about pivotal points of an occupation, that they can offer them to others. Therefore, parents can pave the way for development of their children, thanks to their precious experiences. With the help of their parents, children can know the secret of a job without experiencing anything, which brings them about success, and thus fortune.
Last but not the least, it stands to reason that one is required to work hard so as to get promotion and be prosperous at a job, which needs high level of intelligence and skill. However, this does not mean that if one lacks the attributes mentioned before, cannot be successful. A person can take a job in a reputable company due to his parent's reputation. So, he or she can advance without any effort.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned arguments discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that the merits of choosing a job which is similar to our parent's jobs outweigh those of selecting different jobs on the grounds that it gives children a chance to benefit from their parents' experiences, promote faster, and get accustomed to the workplace easier.
- tpo 8.Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 86
- TPO 25 86
- Most advertisements make the product seem much better than it really is. 73
- Is it more important for students to learn ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 86
- Tpo 33 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workplaces'' or 'workplace's'?
Suggestion: workplaces'; workplace's
...t that people are not familiar with the workplaces atmosphere, rules, co-workers, to name ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...istically proven that there are a great deal of individuals who abandon their works ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...eason that one is required to work hard so as to get promotion and be prosperous at a jo...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'as to', 'at least', 'in summary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218045112782 0.229887763892 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.144736842105 0.158761421928 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0883458646617 0.0866891130778 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0451127819549 0.046263068375 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0545112781955 0.0685040099705 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135338345865 0.118717715034 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0375939849624 0.0351676179071 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89145 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0394736842105 0.0309702414327 127% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103383458647 0.0887237588012 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015037593985 0.0209618222197 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0169172932331 0.0139019557991 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2826.0 2387.08602151 118% => OK
No of words: 475.0 408.028673835 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94947368421 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349473684211 0.338922669872 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.271578947368 0.251872472559 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191578947368 0.174417080927 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141052631579 0.112833075102 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89145 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528421052632 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 62.5838680844 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 29.6875 20.5533526081 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.7429789038 48.84282405 192% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.625 120.699889404 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6875 20.5533526081 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.644075263715 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 56.8453947368 45.7405998639 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.6 1.45489161554 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371683232531 0.300154397459 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115997503551 0.103427244359 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0761909409911 0.0752933317313 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.577324365702 0.497263757937 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18667905596 0.151897553556 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173714837982 0.114077575197 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121337771455 0.0781384742642 155% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.392704634621 0.336927656856 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.103473926882 0.067059652881 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276983687301 0.210909579961 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668735898317 0.0618886996521 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.