It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood.
Do you support or opposite this plan?
Rather than the past decades, nowadays people tends to eat in restaurants. That’s why we can see more restaurants in each corner of our town. Since the people get more tranquil by passing each day, though, they prefer to not cock and serve a ready and more delicious food. Personally, I support if a restaurant is going to build in my neighborhood for the following reasons which I will explore in the following.
First and foremost, they nearby built restaurant enables me to get my food from a closer distance that usually I had to walk a long distance before, and I can save time. In the past, I have always been walking a remote distance to go to a restaurant and have my food served there. However, by building this restaurant I can only not save time, but I am able to invite my friend there sometimes if necessary. Thereby, even If I invited them, due to distance of restaurant and my home, almost none of my friends would have gone there with me. So the new restaurant brings many advantages for me that I am no longer have to go far to eat food and I can also have my family and friends as a solicitation gathering together. Moreover, we can return our early after having our lunch or dinner there, too.
Secondly, I sometimes cock for myself at home, if this restaurant is going to be built, I no longer cock in my apartment and I would rather to receive a food cheaper and sooner. For instance, ten years ago, when I had a room in the town, where I studied there for many years. We had divided the chores. I was cocking for me and my roommates and they each had other tasks to do. When I cocked I really always screwed up and I didn’t make a tasty food until I was living there with my friends. Nonetheless, if I buy my food from a nearby restaurant, I will have more delicious food. That I don’t need to do obsess anymore to study cocking manuals to cock a tasty rice or spaghetti. In fact, I can eat healthier food and it is because a restaurants food is a more reliable food than mine. Thus, from a nearby restaurant I am n have to cock by myself I can prepare a cheap dish from a close distance.
Finally, there is a general consensuses about constructing a new restaurant near the inhabitants of my home. Now we also don’t have any restaurant close to our neighborhood. If a there is going to build a restaurant, it is a plus point for all our neighbors and they all can save time, money and have their dish one time.
- A person you know is planning to move to your city town. What do you think this person would like and dislike about living in your town or city? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following examples It s good to study abroad than studying home 63
- How Segways replace bicycles? 70
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or opposite this plan? 70
- Do you agree or disagree?life is more happy now or in the past? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 745, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'restaurants'' or 'restaurant's'?
Suggestion: restaurants'; restaurant's
... eat healthier food and it is because a restaurants food is a more reliable food than mine....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consensus'?
Suggestion: consensus
...istance. Finally, there is a general consensuses about constructing a new restaurant nea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35434782609 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65863343807 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467391304348 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3005716394 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0454545455 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1105792085 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379214103186 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364148344749 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734324795694 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00555569209547 0.0645574589148 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.