It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age.punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
what sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
Family and school are two essential parts of the society having profound effects on children educating and forming their characteristics. In this way, they employ penalties to teach how to be aware of moral sense at young ages. It is rightly clear that such procedures lead to lack of confidence, decision-making disability, and deteriorating behavioral pattern.
In the beginning, it can be said that some fitting punishments lead to set behavioral patterns for kids. Its long-term effect could be that they can differentiate clearly between wrong and right based on carrying punishment in different issues. On closer inspection, it can be seen that this pattern imposes effective discipline to their life resulting in optimizing lifestyle. However, the dark side of this outlook is that if penalties imposed improperly, they would set a destructive pattern. Developing logical ability is a further significant factor playing an integral role in raising self-scrutiny and analytical proficiency to cope with life probable obstacles.
Considering all these facts, there are viable alternative punishment systems to instruct youngsters. The first option could be that parents deploy “light punishment” in teaching moral ethics to kids. This type of penalty shaped based on debating and warning the devastating consequences of unpredictable behaviors in society and family. This can be helpful when parents teach them the effective system of thinking. Another method is to introduce incentive regulations for modifying misbehavior performance. If taken, the children will practice behaving appropriately in an unintentional way. However, this can make a conditional behavior to expect a benefit from each routine activity.
To sum up, teaching life moral ethics is a long-term investment to have a more civilized world, even though parents employ punishments with an eye to modeling children’s behavior pattern. However, some reformations are needed to prepare a civilized generation for the future of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | Siamak.shabankhah | 76 | view |
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age.punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?what sort of punishment should parents and t 76
- some people think that all university should study whatever they like. others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future,such as those related to science and technology.discuss both these views and give you 84
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unintentional way" with adverb for "unintentional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...en will practice behaving appropriately in an unintentional way. However, this can make a conditional b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69407894737 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25492215963 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7322402085 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.823529412 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29411764706 5.45110844103 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185842162012 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577017114375 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329920916363 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110254346329 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332995982935 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.