it is important to get the news from different news resources
In the last three decades, the world has changed drastically. Hence, it is very crucial to know about the news that happened around the world. Some people believe that it is enough to get information about events from one source. On the other hand, there is a substantial body of evidence claims that it is more beneficial to know about anything that happened form various news resources. From a personal perspective, the latter point of view carries more weight given that individuals could get accurate and more detailed information. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more details.
The first and foremost point, recently, news channels have become very influential and could mislead people in a society. To know the truth, people should get the news form many places. Provided that news channels publish wrong news, they direct people's thoughts in the wrong way. A vivid example the could be given to shed light on what was stated above is, during the Egyptian presidential election in 2013, Al Jazeera channel tried to spread rumors that Egypt did not have a democratic atmosphere. To be more elucidate, this channel wanted to convince the world that Egypt's government was not fair enough, to destroy its picture in the region. On the contrary, the situation was different, so other channels tried to tell the truth to show the world that Al Jazeera was not a trustworthy channel. Consequently, if people see the news in various news channels, they know the truth.
Next, coupled with proper information, details is another virtue form getting the news from many resources. For instance, five years ago, my country had a revolution. To put it in another way, Egyptians protested against venality, to have a better life. Even though the American newspapers published everything about the Egyptian revolution every day, they were not updated. However, when I watch this news on TV, I could see sense visually and get objective information about what happened hourly. As a result, by getting information from TV and newspapers, I could keep myself updated with the latest news.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, getting information about the news from different resources is imperative. Not only to have accurate news, but also to have more details information. It is suggested that news channels be fairer and represent people's voices rather than being greedy, selfish and power hunger.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 37
- using the fuel-cell engine to power cars instead of the internal-combustion engine 76
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 73
- tpo 20 the policy of let it burn and its effect on Yellowstone park 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students can nowadays learn more information and learn it more quickly. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...w the truth, people should get the news form many places. Provided that news channel...
^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...being greedy, selfish and power hunger.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, for instance, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11027568922 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67445439804 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556390977444 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6471909963 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6818181818 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1363636364 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351226655462 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109939920739 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106962672977 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233659167792 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709574437028 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.