In most countries, the average workdays are five days a week. Regarding this, some individuals believe that it is better to work in shorter days with longer working hours, as they can work only three days a week with longer duration instead of working five days a week with shorter time. I, personally, both agree and disagree with this viewpoint due to several conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
On the one hand, three days working makes a lot of free time for people, in which they can learn new things or spend more time with their families. Although individuals can use their time after short working hours, most of them are tired and cannot focus on a particular subject, comprehensively. Also, their leisure time limits to only two days, which leads to decline to be vigorous. An example of this is my father, who is a physician. He used to go to work five days a week, and during weekends he did not have enough energy for his family. Now, he decided to change his schedules and decrease his working time into three days a week without rest. His decision has a good effect on our life, for we can spend more pleasure time together. Therefore, it is beneficial for individuals to work only three days a week for long hours.
On the other hand, most of the employers believe that long hours working decrease their employees’ efficiency, drastically. In this situation, the rate of dissatisfaction consumer (demand) rate may increase which is has a negative effect on costumers’ viewpoints. Imagine that a nurse has nominal mistakes in his/her job, which may cause irreparable damages for patients. Consequently, five days a week working with shorter hours is better, because people do not have to be in a stressful situation not to make any mistakes.
All in all, there are several remarkable reasons to reveal the positive and negative impact of this decision. I believe that longer working hours with shorter days in a week has a lot of pros and cons. Therefore, I described some of the advantages and disadvantages of this decision for a system in the aforesaid paragraphs.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school. 73
- For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...f pros and cons. Therefore, I described some of the advantages and disadvantages of this de...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85123966942 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79376603747 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504132231405 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3689045909 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397866847641 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129134818109 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120969140481 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241129683013 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603316752927 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.